Who's Snowball? Guessing it's the previous name of someone?
Off Topic Afcftw Mafia Game
- Thread starter afcftw
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
- Status
Who's Snowball? Guessing it's the previous name of someone?
You've answered your own question. But lets go and Hang Tash on a whim.When I realised Mito wasn't going to hang I switched to the only other person we had some potential hard evidence on and that was snowball.
Did you know? that Mito was only three players from voting from everyone in the game once. Ask yourself why I know that? Find that answer and you find why i suspected Mito.
Nobody ever disputed the fact that there was evidence against MITO. There was also plenty of logical evidence supporting him though. If there hadn't been he wouldn't have survived. You didn't seem to want to consider it though - and led the charge to get one of our investigators killed. That bit is now indisputable fact. The question of why you did that is the bit we need to decide as a team.
There was, but he killed our detective and was vote hopping from the off. Tell me about the evidence on Tash?
Why not just forget working me out and lynch me, you do need me but lynch me.
Less than seems to have been in activity overdrive for some reason. It could be an intentional strategic play.
There was, but he killed our detective and was vote hopping from the off. Tell me about the evidence on Tash?
The argument of voting for Tash was based on logic.
The cartel hadn't recruited.
Tash hadn't posted/voted.
Ergo, Tash could be the cartel and even if he wasn't he was a non-participating townie who it makes far more sense to kill than a possible investigator.
That line of logic proved right in the end.
There was, but he killed our detective and was vote hopping from the off. Tell me about the evidence on Tash?
Why not just forget working me out and lynch me, you do need me but lynch me.
I'm 100% certain Bri is town so a lynching is the last thing we should be looking at.
I can see the Mafia targetting him though.
Mito Votes
Tobes
Valley
sir tennisball
Less hope than neville,
IBWT ,
BODANKI,
funky,
Lucaaas,
Nobbertos,
gerrez,
ACS,
Seb,
swarbs,
rolando
Tash
Still for mito to vote for
Mikey
Billy
bobby
Dur, why didn't I trust him? dur, maybe because he was drawing attention to himself from the off vote jumping and looking suspicious, murdering our own, claiming roles under duress and looking an all round dodgy **** from start to finish
Tobes
Valley
sir tennisball
Less hope than neville,
IBWT ,
BODANKI,
funky,
Lucaaas,
Nobbertos,
gerrez,
ACS,
Seb,
swarbs,
rolando
Tash
Still for mito to vote for
Mikey
Billy
bobby
Dur, why didn't I trust him? dur, maybe because he was drawing attention to himself from the off vote jumping and looking suspicious, murdering our own, claiming roles under duress and looking an all round dodgy **** from start to finish
It's ok, by the time I'm finished today, i'll be killed, and then It's full steam fallout3 for me
Ok, so whatever happens we can align ACS and Funky - for good or bad.
If these become two known town roles this could make a massive difference. So, convince us!
If these become two known town roles this could make a massive difference. So, convince us!
Thought that's why sir tennis was up for lynching tho..ie to test Mito. .so the vote switchers to Tash. ..poss dodgy
I'm beginning to think sir tennis is...likely..not mafia. .(from his earlier post im in 40% camp re:guilty) due to his helpful posts etc ..and bearing in mind investigation results WERE being switched..tho not sure if this was a one off rule applied to only one investigation ie valleys on Mito, or universal..ie Mito got a switched result vs sirtennis
Na you can get ****ed, you're the great detective Mito the second. Work it out. You can start by addressing my post where you wanted to know why I was suspicious. It was a dangerous post for me put up for reasons I know and it can be worked out, but you wanted to know so address it.
Dur, why didn't I trust him? dur, maybe because he was drawing attention to himself from the off vote jumping and looking suspicious, murdering our own, claiming roles under duress and looking an all round dodgy **** from start to finish
I am open to be convinced Funky, I really am. However, you are still only quoting one side of the argument. Why weren't you at least willing to consider that he MIGHT be innocent based on the logical evidence we had - and which was PROVED to be correct. I'm not asking why you suspected him. I'm asking why you had tunnel vision and didn't want to look at the rest of the evidence? You have to admit that suspecting you is a natural conclusion based on the fact that you didn't want us to even consider the rest of the evidence which we now know was true?
I only have to post one side, it's the side you're asking for, why I was suspicious of him
this town is doomed with you at the helm. post 1890, work it out
I only have to post one side, it's the side you're asking for, why I was suspicious of him
Err. I'm not the one who wanted our PI dead though???
I did look at the other evidence, but is was circumstantial and with the rules being so lose it could have just as easily been a million miles off.
No, it wasn't all circumstantial. There were clues there to read and we read them and saved him. Unfortunately he had a death wish and the meth head took him out which has left us screwed.
- Status