Off Topic Afcftw Mafia Game

Was you expecting posters to make announcements or something? I think you should lead by example and tell us which non-townie team you're on.

 

Watch IBWT accuse me of being quiet later

 

Some people just like to get a vote in to test the water, gauge reactions.
I wager very few will stick with their original votes.

 

I'm a very important member of town for a change.

 

Normally someone would have cocked up by now

 

that's a very early announcement that you have a role within the town #mafiatactic


TBF, you can't be Mafia, you've been far too active already

 

AFC isn't playing

 

I am completely up for going for the quiet people first to be honest.
We always seem to, early on at least, go for the ones posting a lot, and that hasn't been too successful in the past.
So I say we go for the mutes.
It will do one of two things:

1) Force them to talk, so they may actually contribute, or give something away maybe
2) Get rid of the deadwood that isn't really helping the town anyway

 

IBWT will still say im quiet

 

Agree with this. Vote for the quiet ones and they have to speak to defend themselves. If they leave it to their teammates () then they'll be outed.

My votes currently on BobbyD because he's number thirteen but nor as he made a comment yet

 

Can someone create a list of who hasn't posted yet?

 

you do it you lazy ****

 

Following the same logic I'll try and rustle one out of the undergrowth and see what happens

I vote: 666 Tash 666

 

Interesting, a Chelsea, Liverpool and Everton fan in agreement with each other?

 

That wasn't the response I was hoping for

 

Trying to point out loose and very obviously incorrect ties early on?
Sounds like Mafia talk to me!

 

if you're referring to the 'vote for the quiet ones' then its Chelsea, Everton, two Liverpool fans and you, a Swansea fan

 

For me the numbers suggest 2/3 up on a tied lynch is not really much use to us. the odds of pinning a guy whi is bad are actually low enough right now whereas the odds of pinning 3 innocents are as previously calculated reasonably high.

I think at some point in the next 2 days such a tactic will make a lot more sense.. why? simply because if the mafia stay at 3 but the cartel grow to 3 and the serial killer activates thats 7 bad guys and we could be down to say 16 playing so that then becomes a big odds of hitting a bad guy in a tied vote.

Fro me i think eveyone knows it so everyone is just sitting back and not wanting to appear suspicious... but of course theres 3/4 guys who have talked who know sitting back by itself is suspicious so nobodies early activity clears them at all.

At least for now.. as in up to 5pm voting for someone and forcing a single post out of them is as good a tactic as any.

 

or in other words in this game nobody gives a crap who support who in the real world.