Really? At Arsenal, I don't think any of your team had the ball much, and Walcott missed a sitter. Then when we came to you Walcott scored, so I assume your LB should have been concentrating on looking after him better in both games. As I said, people like you, are why English football is crap. Every week you watch a team that plays hoofball. Talking to you about tactics is like discussing astro-physics, with an astrologer.
Walcott was in the middle, to the left of the goal, when he scored, so hardly Taiwo's fault having marked him out the game before and after that. We don't play hoofball. We lost 1-0 away to you in a close game where neither team hoofed it and beat you deservedly at home by, again, not hoofing it but wanting it more and having the game's stand-out player on the day, Taarabt. English football isn't crap- we have the best league in the world and only football snobs like you would think otherwise.
Yep, we are wonderful, superb even; only beaten by those powerhouses of world football South Korea, in the Olympics. If only we had hoofed the ball up to a big forward more, we would probably have beaten them!
Because an under-23 tournament for which we were far less prepared than our opponents and took seven points from the group, three of them against a tidy Uruguay team, is a good indication of British football being crap....
British football is crap, and it all starts from a young age, where a mentality of winning is the most important thing for 7 year old's here. Compared to places like Spain where they learn about enjoying the football at that age. That one thing over time makes such a huge difference.
