I didn't hear it as Acun expecting top half and pushing for top 6 FROM WHEN SELLES TOOK OVER (as some are claiming).
I heard it as being simply:
a) the mutual expectation wasn't that we would just escape relegation by goal difference i.e. it was to be better than that.
and then
b) that the ongoing aim is top half and into top 6 i.e. he wants the club to be successful.
He spoke about the one goal from open play in 8 (or whatever it was), and that 1 was a deflected shot. Quite rightly he was far from satisfied with that. And, reading between the lines, without him pushing Selles under a bus, it sounded pretty clear that there was other stuff that we don't see / don't know about that led to him, Dublin and Hodges concluding they didn't have enough faith that he was the right man to take us forward. Perhaps things like the signing of Joseph (I'm just guessing from bits that were said).
Mike White asked the tough questions tbf, but for me his interview approach was at times embarrassing, and he turned it into a tortuous, unnecessarily repetitive, and negative listen at times. Ask the necessary question, get the answer, move on. I know it's a fine line to tread, and a balance to keep, but I didn't think he did it particularly well.
On the point of late payment of wages, Acun was not complaining that the question was asked, but the fact it was asked just before the team was due to play an important game. So, agree I thought Mike White's approach was rather confrontational rather than investigative.

