I love all the "he's dangerous" stuff being floated about. Absolute ****ing bollocks - most of the people cheering the most want him out because "he's a Paki!" - pure and simple. I donlt mind that - free speech and all that but a bit of honesty would not go amiss
I really can't believe what they dedicate the news resources to these days. ****ing news is pandering to ****ing spastics. Bring back ceefax ****s.
I don't really think he's dangerous. He's just irritating. Saying that though, if it wasn't for the likes of Anjem Choudry stoking up hatred, would we get drummers being hacked to pieces?
I do kinda go along with the Daily Mail style points of view, not only were we allowing this guy a platform to vent his spleen at the Evil west, we were in effect paying for him to do it and at the same time protecting him from the extremes of his own Government's legal system. Whichever way you look at it that's just not right. **** him I say, good riddance to bad rubbish and the Best of British luck in convincing your countrymen you are innocent.
Who's own governments legal system? Did the whole torture not centre round 2 people that may have had contact with him in prison during his two years in prison without charge in the British internment of quite a few Muslims post-911. We're they not abducted by the yanks on a trip to Africa somewhere, flown to Baghram in Afghanistan for some torturing and then taken to the Guantanamo holiday camp, all without a sigle criminal charge being levied at them? Like I said as a Salafi he's obviously a very distasteful character, but away from the hyperbole and rhetoric I'm struggling to find anything he has actually done. Sounds like more "it's all their fault" deflectionary tactics from the Tories if I'm honest
Shock! Horror! Teresa May has announced a comprehensive review and overhaul of Human Rights legislation. How interesting
Forget ifs and buts Jacky, the bottom line is he was granted asylum here and abused that privilege. He is wanted in Jordan on Criminal charges and I can't think of any reason why should he not face trial there?
Criminal, I though they were ambiguous "terrorism" charges, ye know the ones that are so vague it really is hard to mount any sort of defence against in the event you do see trial. But in terms of abusing the privelege, can someone tell me what it is exactly he has done?
Well that's an issue between him and his own country. It's never going to be sorted out by him remaining in the UK is it?
He hasn't been deported because of what he's done here; he's being returned to his own country to face trial for what he's alleged to have done there. The fact that he claimed asylum in this country while continuing to incite hatred against western liberal values obviously motivated the authorities to overcome all legal obstacles to remove the ****. Quite right too, **** him I say. Teresa May's personal vendetta against human rights legislation is a sinister turn though.
