About political threads

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
colognehornet said:
Your definition of a clique appears to be as follows - you insult or belittle enough people and then, when they react, they appear to be a clique ! Yorkie is absolutely correct in his last post - a pub would ban the one customer, not close down the whole shop. Present your alternative views - read the answers to them and try to counteract them with debate and you will be amazed at how open we are on here.
Click to expand...

Those you have helped bully away would totally disagree with you, it just doesn't happen.
 
superhorns said:
Those you have helped bully away would totally disagree with you, it just doesn't happen.
Click to expand...
I am ignoring this SH. You are trying hard to get a response here and I am not giving you that satisfaction. The way you have responded to my attempts with this thread will have shown all of us just what we are up against.
 
superhorns said:
Those you have helped bully away would totally disagree with you, it just doesn't happen.
Click to expand...

This pesonalised accuation is the very reason why such contributions are toxic.
There is zero evidence of what you say... and under my proposal such a poost would be automatically pulled
You will know that Cologne has tolerated your behaviour more than most... and will always respond to any sensible debate with reason

i have no interest in engaging with such dialogues...

Why not go to the political conversations elsewhere... as you have precious little interest in us a Watford fans?
 
superhorns said:
I agree, Cologne is out of order. He soon personalises in a negative fashion.
Click to expand...
This was meant to be a thread where we tried to establish some kind of common code for debating and I have no intention of hanging around to see it turning into a mud slinging competition - you can do that on your own.
 
  • Like
Reactions: oldfrenchhorn, yorkshirehornet and Deleted.......
I have been watching and taking note. Since the beginning of the month SH has made 192 posts of which just 3 have been on non-political issue threads. To me this shows that he has little or no interest in the club, he is not interested in the greater world outside of his bubble, and only gets his kicks by trying to wind others up. Since I closed two threads down, with the option to re-open them if needed, there were no posts from SH, although he spent hours on the site hoping that something would happen. A bit like a child with his nose pressed against the sweet shop window, but with nothing that will get the owner to hand over some goodies. As soon as this thread was started, which by it's nature was not intended to be political, he was back, and we have seen the reaction.
The past week has been good for me as I have been able to get on without wondering if he is creating bad feeling. It is acknowledged to be a good forum in contrast to some places, because there is a lot of thoughtful comment, which SH does not seem to grasp.
You can put him on ignore if you wish, in which case none of his posts will appear for you, or you can take the advice of our Canary friend and simply not reply. I find it extremely sad that he doesn't ever wish to become part of the community of posters, but happy to create as much disruption as he possibly can.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yorkshirehornet and canary-dave
oldfrenchhorn said:
I have been watching and taking note. Since the beginning of the month SH has made 192 posts of which just 3 have been on non-political issue threads. To me this shows that he has little or no interest in the club, he is not interested in the greater world outside of his bubble, and only gets his kicks by trying to wind others up. Since I closed two threads down, with the option to re-open them if needed, there were no posts from SH, although he spent hours on the site hoping that something would happen. A bit like a child with his nose pressed against the sweet shop window, but with nothing that will get the owner to hand over some goodies. As soon as this thread was started, which by it's nature was not intended to be political, he was back, and we have seen the reaction.
The past week has been good for me as I have been able to get on without wondering if he is creating bad feeling. It is acknowledged to be a good forum in contrast to some places, because there is a lot of thoughtful comment, which SH does not seem to grasp.
You can put him on ignore if you wish, in which case none of his posts will appear for you, or you can take the advice of our Canary friend and simply not reply. I find it extremely sad that he doesn't ever wish to become part of the community of posters, but happy to create as much disruption as he possibly can.
Click to expand...

A typical response from the centre of the clique. As usual you have misread the situation but I suppose life is rather slow in the enclave.
 
superhorns said:
Your lie about not posting since the political threads were closed down.
Click to expand...

Yes, two of your three posts this month were made after I closed down the threads, which doesn't change the fact that since last Tuesday you have spent hours looking to see if there was something you could create trouble over. Just stop and look at your posts on this thread. Where is there anything constructive that you have put forward? If you feel like a square peg in a round hole, then you can go in search of something that you might find more accomodating, or if you wish to be banned just tell me, and I can arrange it for you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yorkshirehornet
oldfrenchhorn said:
Yes, two of your three posts this month were made after I closed down the threads, which doesn't change the fact that since last Tuesday you have spent hours looking to see if there was something you could create trouble over. Just stop and look at your posts on this thread. Where is there anything constructive that you have put forward? If you feel like a square peg in a round hole, then you can go in search of something that you might find more accomodating, or if you wish to be banned just tell me, and I can arrange it for you.
Click to expand...

So your comment was deliberately untrue or just not knowing the facts. I have spent my usual amount of time on this forum as I have done over many years. Surely this shows I am interested in WFC affairs on this forum even without the political threads. If I did not visit the site you would accuse me of only being interested in political subjects.
I suppose you are now itching to post your usual posts knocking the UK. Others have correctly identified the shenanigans of the clique.

Can you try to be a little more accurate with your slurs in future.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back