NCPA are an American conservative think tank who've quoted a website run by a guy who works in the West Virginian mining industry who has no discernable qualifications in climate science, so I'd stop using that as a source right away. As for your response to the Skeptical Science link, you seem to have quoted from the 'The Skeptic's Argument...' at the top and have completely ignored the whole part below which counters the skeptic point. If you can't be bothered to even look past this part then your devotion to actually trying to find the answers on the subject is questionable. In light of your efforts I think I'll take Toby's advice. If you're actually interested in finding out the answers on the subject then I'd suggest starting on skepticalscience.com and actually reading what they have to say. For advice on how to find out whether a source is of much use, check out potholer54's videos on Youtube.
soryy Boffo but despite what the source is the figs and stats are there If you can dispute do so, if not then what was the point in getting involved Your first link was a student paper wasnt it? I wont be randomly readingg or watching any of your suggestions, havent the time frankly. However if you have a counter argument or stats I will certainly look into those
