1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

a Takeover Is Not....

Discussion in 'Leeds United' started by BillysStatue, Jul 23, 2012.

  1. 666 & Elmo

    666 & Elmo New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2012
    Messages:
    3,054
    Likes Received:
    324
    I'd say that Bates has told the potential investors that he can no longer wait for them to undertake the full due diligence and he needs to run the club with the intention of being ready for the season, and give the manager the wherewithall to go forward.

    So, he has taken back control to buy and sell players and offer contracts, and it is up to the investors to agree the sale.

    Plenty of time.
     
    #41
  2. BillysStatue

    BillysStatue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2011
    Messages:
    4,316
    Likes Received:
    3,404
    Morning Elmo, you are so close with your observation. The info I was given last nite is Colin has pushed the transfers, and wants Snods money to clinch his final signings. So far so good, but of course we will see how much Bates gives him. Also told Maynard high on Colin's list and could be had for not a lot as Hammers have a shiny new Prem credit card so want him off their books asap. Maynard signing will move Ross on as well, not certain to be Hudders as Saints mentioned where he will be backup. Investors still lining up books and accounts, Bates is still king....for now.
     
    #42
  3. ristac

    ristac Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2011
    Messages:
    28,457
    Likes Received:
    33,145
    Sorry total bollocks - Read Warnocks comments on the official site:
    Add to that the asset value of Snoddy was set at £750K that isn't enough to replace him.
     
    #43
  4. 666 & Elmo

    666 & Elmo New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2012
    Messages:
    3,054
    Likes Received:
    324
    What Warnock tells us via the official site and what he really wants and thinks are two completely different things, and it is just so naive to think otherwise.

    Don't understand what you mean by this £750k asset value stuff. If Snods was valued in the books as £750k and we just got £2m+ for him, we have made a very healthy profit margin.
     
    #44
  5. Infidel

    Infidel Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2011
    Messages:
    5,506
    Likes Received:
    6,782
    #45
  6. Massimo Cellino

    Massimo Cellino Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2011
    Messages:
    454
    Likes Received:
    118
    Erm, if I may. I sold Snoddy because a) he wanted to go and b) we need cash fast to do what we need to do in pre-season.

    His asset value of £750k is a rather nice sweetener for me though, as I get to trouser the £2.75 million we got for him and then only reduce the sale price of the club by £750k. Leaving me £2M up and you morons a captain down.

    Have you not been paying attention for the last 7 years? This really is standard procedure by now. <ok>
     
    #46
  7. leeds60

    leeds60 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2011
    Messages:
    8,168
    Likes Received:
    3,428
    We have got a reported £3m for Snoddy not bad for someone who cost £35k this along with the £1.5m we will recieve for Rossshould give us enough funds to get 4 quality players in Cox /Maynard Hamill Peltier ande a CB
     
    #47
  8. Simon21-LUFC

    Simon21-LUFC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2011
    Messages:
    5,585
    Likes Received:
    92
    We'll never see the full £3m. We're only getting £1.5m up front and that won't all go to the team. We won't even be able to replace Snoddy with someone even approaching as good let alone add other players on top.
     
    #48
  9. tommylion

    tommylion Active Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2011
    Messages:
    1,284
    Likes Received:
    10
    Money is probably already nestling nicely in Uncle Kens off-shore account.....wonder if the taxman knows!
     
    #49
  10. ristac

    ristac Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2011
    Messages:
    28,457
    Likes Received:
    33,145
    Read the quote from the guy from LUST and the link posted by Bucks... New owners wanted Snoddy to stay, his asset value was set for takeover purposes at £750K - Harvey sanctioned the sale, meaning his asset value has to be put back and anything over that wasn't included in the sale so Bates gets to keep it.
     
    #50

  11. Massimo Cellino

    Massimo Cellino Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2011
    Messages:
    454
    Likes Received:
    118
    Is there an echo in here?

    ...in here? :bandit:
     
    #51
  12. BillysStatue

    BillysStatue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2011
    Messages:
    4,316
    Likes Received:
    3,404
    If "new" owners wanted to keep Snods they would have offered him more to stay than Norwich did. Problem is there are no new owners...yet...so Bates cracks on and does what's good for Bates. He has stalled the investors for as long as he can, we're into the business end of pre-season and if they want a return by getting to the Prem this season they need to cough up what Bates wants quickly now. Call Bates what you want, but he knows how to build pressure in a negotiation.
     
    #52
  13. BillysStatue

    BillysStatue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2011
    Messages:
    4,316
    Likes Received:
    3,404
    Arab news report not news, and no investor's name put to the story. Funny how they quote "potential investor" and don't say "buyer".
     
    #53

Share This Page