You are not ahead in this debate Eddie, there is no debate, it is all utter nonsense as you are well aware. Simply put you don't believe 9/11 was an inside job and i doubt you ever did, you post these threads for fun to see if you can push people's buttons.
I would hardly describe googling someone's name and posting the 1st hit I got as "work" eddie. You need to get out more.
during the collapse of the structure dust was created from breaking concrete/plasterboard. smoke from the fires will have added to this. wtc7 appeared to fall in a manner similar to a controlled explosion because the steel frame was compromised by the heat from the fire, in a controlled explosion the steel frame would have been compromised by explosives but the principle is the same, damage the structure and the building falls down.
Eddie will now go on to state that the Buildings fell at "Freefall" speed...despite the fact that "all" the film footage clearly shows debris falling faster than the buildings, meaning that while the debris was falling at Freefall speed, the buildings most certainly were not
im not an engineer but its far more plausible than secret mole armies who dug under the foundations because the jews wanted a few days off.
You can't argue with people like this, but thankfully they will never be taken seriously. What's far more harmful is the popular opinion that "the terrorists are attacking us because they are evil and they hate our freedoms." All the stupid patriots have lapped up this reasoning from their governments and are allowing them to continue with their monstrosities in the Middle East, under the reasoning that they're fighting for our freedoms. Even the brave men over there in the armed forces genuinely believe that they're fighting for our freedoms, when if anything all they're doing is undermining freedoms. Conspiracy theorists can suck my balls, they're annoying, but it's the blind patriotism which is really harmful.
wtc was built before buildings were designed to resist disproportionate collapse. as a result of this there was little built in redundancy of structure so when one part failed the rest failed very quickly. this was accelerated by the pre weakening of the structure by fire. well either that or mole men.
I've explained this to you before Put one hand out in front of you, palm facing upwards. Now place a piece of paper on your hand. Bring your other hand down quickly and observe. The paper is sent flying from your hand. The same applies in the case of a building. As for objects landing "100s of feet from the building", all objects ejected from the building would fall in line with a parabolic curve. As the building was very high, this curve would explain why objects have landed "100's of feet away". That's not even bringing into account the wind.
The main structural element of the WTC towers was built as a central column, in order to allow for more office space. As soon as it is compromised it all comes down. If it was a conventional design (equally distributed loads to perimeter columns) then they would have stood. Eddie refuses to accept this because he once made a handheld windmill out of aluminium.
Warning Signs There are many warning signs indicating that your critical thinking may be in danger. Consider the following. If any of these signs are found, one has to seriously reconsider their position. - The experts on your side seem to be plain wrong on many details, but you still support other parts of their research, because these parts of their work support your views. - Thinking you are now able to see through the entire plot, wondering why almost nobody else can. - Being overly enthusiastic about the subject. - Refusing to critically go through what the other side is presenting. - Ignoring and forgetting unpleasant evidence. - Thinking the perpetrators leave clues and you can solve it all in the internet. - Thinking you have all the facts and need no further research, thinking your mind is set. - Thinking every participant would be silent, every media controlled. - After being thoroughly debunked in one detail, moving on to the next detail without reconsidering your position. - Not believing in the original detail that made you belive in a conspiracy, but having found other reasons along the way, that still make you believe in a conspiracy. - Not being able to understand the details your belief is based on (example: Claiming thermite, but not knowing how it works). - Having very strong disregard for any opposition. - Thinking the governments are evil. Not trusting anything that contradicts your belief, because everything is somehow related to or controlled by the government. - Believing in events that are very unorthodox or unique only to a conspiracy theory. (examples: Weakening the structure with explosives for an hour before a controlled demolition, Thermite being used to bring down buildings) - Avoiding answering questions. - Basing your beliefs on the events following the attacks (examples: They lied about the WMD’s so they must be lying about everything, They did it to justify two wars).
