If you believe chomsky then they might as well have done it, because what they have done since is worse than what happened on 9/11
Like Galloway I can't agree with his politics but they are both very intelligent men and I admire true intellect.
Are you saying he's too stupid to understand what others can plainly see? Or is he too scared to speak out? Does what he said not make absolutely, crystal clear, irrefutable sense?
Exactly. They tell it like they see it too. Without fear nor favour. Not enough of that around, regardless of their politics.
I don't like him. A head of state should always wear a tie and be clean-shaven. Clearly not to be trusted.
So show me some quotes where John Pilger says 9/11 was an "inside job". Or are you just going to throw random names at me and suggest that the people you name are truthers without actually backing it up with any hard evidence?
I'll pass. I think you know why. What about Noam Chomsky eddie? btw George Galloway said only "yesterday" he does not believe the CT on 9/11. Have you a more recent article where he said he was not sure?
Dev, I dont want to argue with you anymore, the subject has been diverting too much of my attention in recent weeks, you believe that al qaeda done it and the towers fell because of structural failure naturally, I believe that they fell in a controlled demolition which can only mean an inside job. We can argue back and forth till the end of time but there will never be a full answer that everyone will agree on, at least I doubt it anyway. We disagree on the subject and thats that, I am now focusing on my true mission in life, and that is providing quality winners at fair prices on a regular basis for followers of The Trainer.
Dev, actually people have see fully laden 747's crash into giant buildings, what they havn't seen is those buildings suddenly collapse into their own basements. If they even fall, which is very rare, they tend to fall like a tree, toward the damage, generally they just burn for a day or 2. And those building weren't designed to be hit by a fully laden plane like the WTC's were. even if you forget the inside job the rest of the 'nutter' evidence, there is plenty of other evidence to prove that this was either planned by the US, or purposefully let happen. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a brainwashed moron. Fighter pilots know the difference between north east and sout west, no one can convince me of otherwise, and for me that is the most compelling evidence I need, that every single intercept fighter was sent away from the hijacked planes when all 4 could've been downed within 20 mins. This act of diverting air cover ensured 9/11 would happen and nothing could stop it
There are so many lies or mistruths in your argument that it would take me half an hour to type a reply. Suffice to say they were not 747s and the buildings did not collapse "suddenly". There is no evidence whatsoever of a "controlled demolition", none, only gossipmongering and ignorance. Name me any Conspiracy Theory and i'll provide "proof" of it being "Fact". It's that easy. Tell me this, when did you ever see a fully fuelled passenger jet crash into a building over 100 storeys high? Never? Then how could anyone know that it was impossible for the building to collapse?
I used to, but when you see the explanation of what actually happened (and not some more Truther fairy tales) it makes perfect sense exactly what happened to it.