I don't believe you've ever said no to anything, Gambol. You seem like the 'try it at least once' kind of guy to me.
Its pitiful seeing a grown man like Dev waffling and clurching at straws and evading questions. Can someone have a word with him please. Its becoming embarassing.
where to begin with this post? the point is re afghanistan the reports that you are choosing to accept as the truth, lied as a soldier you probably know that there was bombings in afghanistan before 9/11 anyway i digress. I agree that 'proving' anything is difficult. all you can do is look at what is being presented and who is presenting it. Historically the US have form for doing things and covering things up. At the risk of starting something different look at the cover up of the USS liberty, or lets blow up guantanemp bay and blame cuba, or the war in the phillipines where the phillipines fired first dont even get me started on the cover up of the huge payouts the US inflicted on their own people, including soldiers given faulty masks to se the impact of radiation of chenobyl you mention the 'freefall' of the towers and scientific evidence. The problem is there is scientific evidence on both sides. and are any of these sides actually official government views? WTC7 for example was ignored in the 9/11 commission report. yes steel melting or warping has been addressed. some say the heat was enough and prove it warped. Others prove it wasnt enough and that the 47 core columns should have stood. There is no plausible explanation of why the core columns would have broken, or even buckled, so as to produce global collapse Is this simply a case of bringing in something else when one thing is addressed? or basically identifying a flaw in the argument? bottom line is that to ask questions does not qualify a CT. Yes CT's exist, as do truthers. I dont put myself in either category. doesnt mean i am right with my assertions/beliefs. some a based on reports/what i see. some are based on experience etc main thing is what doesnt make sense gets questioned. everybody knows for example the american justification for guantanemo. but how many know that they have changed the classifications of the prisoners to justify themselves, its agains the UN agreed resolutions. Only 2 countries in the world support it. Israel and some obsecure little place?
You know what? I don't care. I've gone over what seems like every point again and again and i'm now bored ****less because you are merely doing what all other CTers do. Going over old ground. You are obviously a superior being whose powers of forensic analysis give you an insight that we mere mortals can but dream of. If you choose to believe that Mossad and the CIA blew up the towers.........good for you.
well apart from the fact that i have never asserted/maintained/said that cia and mossad did it, you came onto a thread i put on GC. no one forced you to do it. YOU DID IT! you chose to come on and response or is that a CT too? If any one has illusions of superior knowledge its you soldier. I was in the military dont you know, so i have 'insider' knowledge. I have tried to abstain from abuse etc, but you really are full of ****. this is an internet forum not a war. good luck to you
"If any one has illusions of superior knowledge its you soldier. I was in the military dont you know, so i have 'insider' knowledge." Dev needs nobody to stick up for him but that's a bit rich coming form someone who never fails to drop the fact he was a teacher into conversation - usually to make out that he's cleverer than the people with whom he's arguing.
i'll give you the chance to point something out to me. If anything my 'dropping' i was a teacher has got me no end of abuse, some funny some pathetic, and some when there is no other answer In fact i would argue that myteaching background is used more by others than me. In fact in arguments that have nothing to do with teaching in any way. As for cleverer, some of the thickest ****s i know are teachers.
dev, the companys who do the science are picked by the criminals The scientists dont need to be in on anything ya loonball, they get told what to do and what results are expected. all you have to do is really look at the board of the 9/11 commission and you know that this was a cover up, thats the bottom line, no matter what you keep telling yourself about how 50 thosand people would have to be in on something. there is quote after quote on people from the 9/11 commision sayin they were not allowed to their job, it was a whitewash
dont be silly eddie you CT Philip zelikow was not the ececutive director, he wasnt part of the bush-cheney administration he hadnt already written a book with condoleeza rice, Zelikow wasnt appointed to the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board condoleeza rice never asked zelikow to rewrite the first draft by Richard Haas as she wanted something 'bolder' no other members of the commission have said "Zelikow is calling the shots. He's skewing the investigation and running it his own way." now behave
Right, calm down you lot. This debate seems to have got a little out of control. Now, take a deeep breath, and start again from the top.
Now you are really showing yourself up eddie. What about George Galloway? Is he an idiot or a Government shill? Noam Chomsky, what's his kickback, what does he gain out of this? On my talksport show last week and even more on my New York talk show, I am practically the only person talking who doesn't believe in the conspiracy theories about 9/11 being an inside job. George Galloway [video=youtube;TwZ-vIaW6Bc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwZ-vIaW6Bc&NR=1[/video]
im well aware of Geroge Galloways opinion on the subject, but he has at times said, thats interesting, he is not a closed book.
