You're a Celtic fan and by definition are a confirmed conspiratorialist baby Swivel on that cute buttocks.
Get some new material eh? That "attempted" insult is so old it has whiskers, you saying on an almost daily basis is becoming ever so tiresome.
as i said i knew you think its an attempt at riling you. but lets look at the evidence on discussing the flotilla, the only 'evidence' you will accept is the 'official' one. regardless of the holes in it. every body else is lying on 9/11, everyone is a conspiracy theorists and wrong except the ones who agree with the government line Its the simple things really, you say that as a soldier you were ****ting yourself (as were the majority of the other 600 (i think you said 600 havent checked)) and wrote to your MPs, you have spoken of fear, the difference betwen normal soldiers and sas. yet you cant accept the simple question that the hijackers of 9/11 carried out everything with military precision and succeeded without shouting conspiracy.
was the following a lie/tongue in cheek? Our first tour of NI everyone in the Regiment was ****ting themselves and almost all 600 of us wrote to our MPs. It ended up with only 14 of us going, it was a tough 4 months I can tell you.
No, the throrists are poking holes in the official theory. They are not giving exact answers, they are providing their own theories based an what is demonstrably extremely improbable (dubious collapses), visual evidence, sonic evidence, and basically what shape they see that fits the hole. Not all, very few are right but most are able to poke holes in the official theory and that is enough to arouse suspicions that something is not right.
are you now in politics? i asked you to explain this on theactual thread. you didnt but ok, if i got it wrong my bad I still think you as a soldier would be maybe provide more insight into the fear/adrenaline etc on the front line. I hear people say, actually its easy to fly a plane with minimal training. I agree. but into a building in those circumstances? at the least its a valid question i have held and fired guns, does that make me a soldier, would i be able to fire one on the front line? as i say there are things that dont make sense. I some cases it mabe naievity, in others its obvious and some dont want to see it for example that attack on afghanistan. the american line was it was not pre planned. some geezer even said something like if you can show it was he will buy you a a meal at the best restaurant in NYC. or something along those lines fast forward to tony blair, and he explains how they were looking for a reason to attack. He even said 9/11 gave them the excuse/legitimacy etc why not question this?
1: I can provide no insight into flying planes into buildings, I doubt anyone alive could. 2: No it does not make you a soldier because there is a lot more to soldiering than simply firing guns. 3: If Afghanistan was full of Taliban training camps then I think an invasion was fully justified, in fact it would have been remiss of the US/UK not to invade and attempt to root them out surely? 4: That hardly means Blair (or anyone else) arranged for terrorists to kill 3000 innocent civilians in an effort to justify said war. Why not question it? I have. I have already admitted that when I saw Loose Change I thought it raised some very serious questions about who was responsible. I did think there was a possibility that it was an inside job but after much research and investigation into the arguments raised by 9/11 "truthers" I found that most of the information (if not all) put forward by truthers was lies and misquotes. Conspiracy "truth" requires that people who have no expertise in the fields of science which they were discussing, are classed as "experts", truthers never question the motives or relevance of anyone who supports their argument It's 10 years since 9/11, don't you think by now if it was a conspiracy between Mossad and the CIA someone would have slipped up by now and blurted out the truth or even part of it? What kind of feeble conspiracy must have it been that some nutter with a laptop and a vivid imagination could find out the truth, make a movie about it and show it to the world without once being victim of an assassination attempt to silence him? People rattle on about all sorts, some people use spurious science to support their theories and some imagine that they see things in videos and newsclips which simply did not happen. A case in point is the collapse of the Twin Towers, some people swear the buildings were a controlled demolition because the buildings were in "freefall". When the flaw in that argument is pointed out they simply move onto the next piece of "evidence" which the say supports their case. It's like a giant magical jigsaw and CTers simply force the parts that don't fit into this bizarre pasttime.
"It's like a giant magical jigsaw and CTers simply force the parts that don't fit into this bizarre pasttime. " Totally agree .
