4-1-4-1

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

yarco canary

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2011
3,047
92
48
gt yarmouth
If as the general consensus seems to be that we will line up 4-1-4-1,
who would you start with and where (if everyone is available)
Here is my first attempt.
Ruddy
Martin Turner Bassong Olsson
Tettey
Bennett Howson Johnson Redmond
Jerome

No doubt you guys will have your own ideas.
 
Unfortunately I think Bassong is wishful thinking, but I appreciate you are saying if he were available

For me:

Ruddy
Martin Turner R Bennett Olsson
Johnson
Redmond Howson Hoolahan Lafferty
Jerome

I actually think that, given Hooper and Jerome seem to have developed a decent partnership, Neil will stick to that. If things go awry he then might seek to change to his preferred formation
 
Ruddy
Martin Turner Bennett Olsson
Johnson
Redmond Howson Hoolahan Jerome
Hooper

Although I wouldn't be surprised to see a genuine left midfielder join, or a box-to-box midfielder in place of Hoolahan. That front 5 should be a major threat going forwards, although I fear we'd be too exposed defensively.
 
Ruddy
Martin Turner Bennett Olsson
Johnson
Redmond Howson Tettey Jerome
Hooper

I don't think we can afford the luxury of Howson AND Hoolahan in the starting 11.
 
Ruddy
Martin Turner Bennett Olsson
Johnson
Redmond Howson Tettey Jerome
Hooper

I don't think we can afford the luxury of Howson AND Hoolahan in the starting 11.

This would be my prefered option. Although it was close between Tettey & O'Neil
 
I would prefer Tetty as the holding mid-fielder as Jonno has less discipline to play this position, too attack minded. Basically same team with those two switched.
 
Ruddy
Martin Turner Bennett Olsson
Johnson
Redmond Howson Tettey Jerome
Hooper

I don't think we can afford the luxury of Howson AND Hoolahan in the starting 11.

I take your point and think a lot of people would agree with you. But for me, two of Tettey, Johnson and O'Neil on the pitch at the same time is just much too defensive in a division where we should be taking most teams head on and trying to force the win!
 
I'd go for;

Ruddy
Martin Cuellar Bassong Garrido
Johnson
Redmond Howson Hooper Olsson
Jerome

In fairness Hooper would be playing as a second striker almost but with deeper lying defensive duties sitting on any deep-lying playmakers and springing forward when we have the ball, his form is coming back and I just couldn't leave him or Jerome out.
The left side is the real quandry though. Oneil keeps the ball well enough and is decent, Lafferty provides an outlet and yellow cards, but they as well as the rest of the squad appear round pegs in a square hole. Only the Murphy's maybe other options for me, but I would go for the two most natural left sided players we have (I also think Garrido's delivery is better than most so that would be another big plus), with Whittaker on the bench to cover LB in case of injury.
I would rotate Johnson and Tettey. Howson would be easily interchanged with Oneil or Vardis. And Hooper could be interchanged with Vardis or Hoolahoops.
Like others, if Neil can get Bassongs mind right I would have him back in the team, but thats a big if! My fear with Ryben is his likelyhood to be injured. What we need is a good settled back four to develop a good understanding. Again though Cuellar has probably been our best CB so far, so when fit he should play (But are him and Bass both left siders? If they are could it work anyway?)
There it is, though I won't be entering it into any of the prediction leagues anytime soon.

Bah!
 
Given that Howson is banned, I'd go for:

Ruddy
Whittaker Martin Turner Olsson
Tettey
Redmond Hooper Hoolahan Johnson
Jerome

Johson's goal-scoring this season means he should be playing IMO.