This race has become like an Agatha Christie novel.
I won't be going this year that's for sure
This race has become like an Agatha Christie novel.
There was a good form boost for Danon Decile today Grendel. I expected to see that one go blue but he isn't quoted. Obviously missed something thereAventure is the latest to inherit the potential curse of being favourite for the Arc now. After Kalpana being the ridiculously short Fav by default last year's runner up now occupies the position of no value. I think if Sosie had won today it would have been pretty close between the two and Minnie Hauk at the head of affairs.
I feel Sosie will be thereabouts with the possibility that he will be cherry ripe on Arc day and I still don't understand why they took him over for the Eclipse.
I am still not convinced by Minnie Hauk and don't really rate anything she has beaten. Twirl certainly blotted her copy book today and is now 33/1 for that Arc after looking an extremely skinny 6/1 coming in today.
Aventure won a fairly poor looking race if you ignore Twirl who stank the place out.
Happy with Sosie at 20/1 and may have a bit more at 12/1 because I can't see him being double figures on the day.
There was a good form boost for Danon Decile today Grendel. I expected to see that one go blue but he isn't quoted. Obviously missed something there
On Sunday, Byzantine Dream was the fastest of the Arc trials (by over a second) and he was beaten 4½L by Danon Decile in Jan. I didn't realise DD had run in that Juddmonte International Stakes. He was "Edgy, keen to post, took keen hold...." and it was over 10f so may not have been his true running. Anyway as you say, looks like he is out and, like Regaleira, might not go on soft ground anywayNot sure what that boost was Ron. I hadn't backed him for the Arc because I wasn't sure about the ground and was waiting to see nearer the time. I was disappointed by his effort in the Eclipse, where I did back him, but after that I wrote him off. I don't think he is entered.
I wish I found it that easy Oddy.Minnie Hauk looks the obvious answer
I wish I found it that easy Oddy.
How did you come to that conclusion? She hasn't beaten much
The only one I could consider as obvious is Aventure, in form, goes well on soft, 2nd last year, C&D winner
As I understand ORs, even with her 7lbs she's still 3lbs behind Aventure.Most 3YO fillies haven't beaten much at this stage of their career. Ballydoyle will know exactly where they stand with Aventure through Bedtime Story and for me Minnie Hauk ticks all the boxes and has the weight advantage. She is only 3lbs behind Aventure on OR and has significantly higher TS and RPR figures. And she gets 7lbs WFA.
I am not seeing it with Minnie Hauk. I feel most of her success has been down to a dearth of talent in her sex age group.
She did improve on early season form but very much needed to as she started from a Handicapper's mark. In the Oaks I was convinced Desert Flower was a cert but she flopped in third. The trainer said it was the track she didn't like but we have not seen her again so I think it may be that she didn't train on but managed to get away with it in the Guineas. Whirl went on to win the Nassau and was awarded a rather silly looking rating of 122 for a wide margin win on gutters. She went off odds on and was stone last afterwards when running 12 lbs lower on RPR.
I think the whole ratings picture went wrong when they gave Desert Flower running to 113 in the Oaks. That knocked Minnie Hauk up to 120 and Whirl to 119. The trouble with that RPR for Desert Flower is that it was 1 lb HIGHER than she ran to in the 1000 Guineas. Her Guineas rating was 5 lbs lower than her best 2YO run, again suggesting she won it without training on.
Since then the O'Brien Fillies have been racing older horses like Estrange and Sea The Fire, who I consider overrated and adding to their reputations by default. Yes you can only beat what is put in front of you but you need to be confident that the suggested abilities of the opposition is correct.
It's just as well Aidan isn't rating them. He'd probably have Minnie Hauk on 135 and Whirl on 134
yes that's itMinnie Hauk 117
Aventure 120
You've foxed me there Bustino. Are you saying the OR includes WFA? I thought they were simply based on the level of form displayed?
It must do. Otherwise how do you compare generations? How do you explain for example that Brigadier Gerard's 3yo rating was 141 yet his 4yo rating was only 144. The 4yo BG would have beaten the 3yo BG by 10 lengths at level wights in May/June time of the 1972 season. It's the same with different horses. My guess is Aventure's OR hasn't changed much from last year. Of course she's better than last year though.You've foxed me there Bustino. Are you saying the OR includes WFA? I thought they were simply based on the level of form displayed?