Even "Arry get's in on the act "Luka is not for sale," said Redknapp. "If there has been a bid of £22m, that is ridiculous. "There are people being sold for £20m who are not fit to lace Luka's boots."
Imagine if I started a Rooney is ''Dirk Kuyt with a temper article'' on the Man United board.I reckon it wouldn't go down well.It would go down like a lead balloon,because lets be fair.In the Republic of Mancunia,Rooney is ''world class''.Not according to the rest of the world he's not.He's also according to the Republic of Mancunia got ''wonderful technique''.What?...He's got no technique.Compare him to Luis Suarez who has got technique and Rooney looks like Kevin Davies.Rooney has no composure,no first touch,and he's not the most prolific by any means. He didn't exactly set the world alight in last years world cup,now did he.And thats putting it mildly.He couldn't trap a bag of cement.Oh however according Man United fans he had ''personal problems''. These articles are written for a reason. Are people pissed off that Liverpool are finally signing promising young players,or are they pissed off Liverpool are actually spending money,as they have no right to according to some ''unwritten rule'' than us Liverpool fans know nothing about. It must be that Liverpool are finally financially a threat to English footballs ''media darlings'',That if Liverpool are competitive then somethings not right.When Phil Jones was signed by the 'media darlings'' it was a ''clever move'' ''great piece of business''.When Liverpool do it,its a ''waste of moneny.I cannot stand this hypocrisy.And theres far too many articles on it.
Is that last bit a Henderson reference form old Harry? Modric in the PL 10/11 - 3 goals, 2 assists. Henderson in the PL 10/11 - 3 goals, 4 assists.
take out all the childishness... seeing it is the summer and a lot of guys are bored its understandable.... henderson had WHO beside him in a flat 4-4-2? i think you'll find that was a big issue. you see the mancs on here are forgetting that midfield had to cover the awful cbs on show... the u21s played so deep wellbeck was at full back lol.... see how silly this is? come on guys debate the actual match on its merits.
I agree with Suarez. With a few exceptions, Liverpool fans on this board are happy to engage in debate with the sensible Utd posters. But the Henderson string of threads is nothing more than a serial WUM. Take the title of this one- [ Spelling Nazi Mode- Swanee, not swanny] -do you think that is designed to engender a friendly exchange of views? Hardly. The question has been answered dozens of times already, not least by the other Utd fans on here.
2 games. A mentally challenged person started this thread, don't laugh at the mentally challenged person please.
Who wants to start a ''Phil Jones is a rubbish defender,Man United were robbed to the tune of £19.5 million'' article. ''Or Roy Hodgson robbed Man United blind by making them pay £10 million for a centre half he paid £100k for,and every time he played for Fulham..they lost''.article.
Wowzer KPR you weren't a happy bunny when you wrote this were you. An interesting point though, it is funny how different fans see different things. I always see Liverpool as the media darlings - Redknapp, Collymore, Hansen, Thompson, Lawrence that dude of talk sport etc. It has always got on my nerves how the media are so Liverpool friendly. When Liverpool play on channel 5 or whatever channel it is now , no dig intended, the commentator refers to the players on first name terms. Not being a wum I just find it interesting how different fans can have such different media perspectives.
Just posted a Phil Jones thread on the Man Utd board, just to even things out and keep harmony in the world.
no dig intended... what a joker.... all i can say is lol.... garry neville.. may, mascherano lol.... every utd fans thinks everyone is against them... most fans seem to think the same about their club and the media... just get over it lad. if someone wants to actually debate the u21s match i guess a new thread is needed.....
There was no dig intended - they don't do it on sky they do it on Channel 5 or what it is - therefore no dig intended. United in general think everyone is against them - its that siege mentality which has got us the trophies we have got
Interesting point KingEric. It always seems to me that the non- footballing media always look to mention Utd whenever any sort of football issue enters the mainstream news, but that's probably just laziness- picking on the most well-known name. There do seem to be a disproportionately large number of ex-Liverpool players around as pundits, but that could be because the employers realise how expert and incisive and unbiased their opinions are. I imagine it's the same reason that all the Utd supporters haunt our board.
You DO realise you're talking about a TV Channel which plugs Jean Claude Van-Damme Films during their games
Liverpool ''pundits'' are unbiased. Before anyone says Jamie Redknapp is ''Liverpool biased'' thats further from the truth,because he's biased towards any club his old fella manages and whoever his fat cousin plays for. Phil Thompson can be a little bit ''Liverpool biased'',However he has an excuse,He's a Liverpool fan,an ex Liverpool player and captain.He's from Liverpool. Whats Lou Macari's excuse with his Man United bias on ****anta sports?