Or 853m euros. The cost of the Man City squad. The most expensive in Europe. Man Utd are 3rd on 784m euros. Chelsea 4th on 664m Liverpool 8th on 437m Arsenal 9th on 416m Spurs 10th on 361m.. Thats a lot of money.
Where's the cut off point? What cost does the squad have to be to tip it from meaningful to meaningless? Let me guess, is it 416.5m? I honestly dont think City fans (all 6 of them) give a **** about how you feel about City winning the title. But this is a meaningless conversation anyway, because City aint gonna win the title, not with Pep in charge. They might win the CL, but not the PL.
Then why have City not won the league since 2014? Why have Real Madrid won only 3 La Liga's in the last 10 years? Money sure as **** helps, I only need to look at my own club to see that. But it doesn't guarantee anything. QPR were bought by a billionaire and spent a **** load and they were relegated (Still makes me chuckle to this day )
Quite true, I should say "he who has the most money with a well known branded football team will have a much better chance of winning the league" (in England)
Check Bod out trying to justify the trophies Money laundering FC have purchased in the last 14 years Yeah, yeah ok Bod....when the rest of us start buying talent and dumping it on loan or on the bench so that other teams can't grow and challenge...we might agree..until then...
you're already trying that. You've ruined GKN, Jansen, Sissoko, Njie, Soldado. Luckily Bentaleb, Paulinho managed to get away and are having relatively successful careers. Who did chelsea buy who was a big name to prevent another team buying for their first team squad?