Separate names with a comma.
And I suppose the way some people on here have made me out, you didn't know what to expect. He gave Paynter far more game time than he should...
And he did actually tinker with it towards the end of the season, costing us promotion.
Grayson did well in playing his best players?
Not really. I'd appreciate it if you took my word for it, though. :) But here's your proof anyway:...
Grayson did really say that. I don't make things up. I could probably find it on our website or the Evening Post's.
You're talking absolute nonsense, Mark. It's not surprising when you've said Grayson is better than 17 managers because we finished above 17 teams.
They all finished in the top six. Only two teams can finish in the top two. And isn't it ultimately about the quality of the squads? Grayson...
And why would you say that?
By Grayson?
Paynter is as good as Becchio according to Grayson.
Are you being serious, Mark? And Donald, are you really saying that Grayson is better than Lambert?
Tell me why. And, Josh, I don't jump on anyone who says anything positive about Grayson, I counter people who say things that are ridiculously...
So you heard something that makes Grayson look bad, yet you still post it on here and insist he's a good manager?
Who is he better than and why?
It means I'm not getting into a discussion where I make sensible points and other people say ridiculous things. Why are my comments pointless?
And there's another vote for the sack. It's tiring making all these accounts. ;)
Why is it delusional to think that a poor manager should be sacked?
He hasn't done it in the whole time he's been here and we had the JPT to give youth a chance in.
There's three and only one is mine. Three out of fifteen isn't bad when you consider how many deluded people are about.
We were heavily linked with Frank Lampard but apparently O'Leary thought he was too expensive. :(
