Separate names with a comma.
no offence meant to dt2, but i rarely read his posts, partly for this reason and partly for his condescending tone he has towards those with a...
i wonder if things were different, would have have come back and held your hands up saying you were wrong? didn't think so.
injuries haven't forced him to pick SWP or play park on the left.
so you think they should have started against a team like WHU?
he is responsible for starting SWP and playing park out of position. and only reacting once we were chasing the game.
i've been in the hughes camp, but why that XI against the hammers? surely one of taraabt or hoilett should have started??
agree with this, just seems every thread has to be about him, crying out for attention. yawn.
i knew it was coming, but still made me laugh anyway.
i'll have a few from around 6pm onwards, unfortunately drinking in the office is frowned upon for some unknown reason.
can't see them agreeing to 50%, paladini didn't sort it.
the sequal often isn't.
sense at last!
exactly. with half a mind on the fact that the last two managers got half a season.
IF that happens, then it's a different story.
we're 5 games in!!! 5!! 3 of which were against top 4 sides!!
agree the situation isn't ideal, i just think yet more upheaval wouldn't do us any good. hughes is a mid table boss imo.
**** me. how opinions have changed since sunday.
whilst we all wanted a good win to give us a bit of confidence, losing in the mickey mouse cup is hardly a disaster. anything other than a win on...
this.
me too, the only one i thought of as i was scrolling down was gullit!
