Separate names with a comma.
<laugh><laugh><laugh>.
No, he's not <ok>
<laugh><laugh><doh>.
It takes a special talent to make a fake bomb out of explosives though.
I've just killed him. And I can report that he's still a fud. Oh well.
I can honestly say I've don't know a single Celtic fan whose hatred for Rangers was greater than his or her support for Celtic, nor vice versa....
He's talking about you lot too you know <laugh>
What a load of drivel <ok>
What a load of utter pish you talk. "Ceptic" and "Rankgers" ffs <laugh>
This still has a few pages to go before it "beats" the "debate is over" thread <laugh>
"Ceptic" <doh><doh><doh>
No I did not. Obviously. :emoticon-0173-middl<grr><wah><laugh>
Hmmmmm. I'll leave Rebel to reply to this <laugh>
So in that case, in what scenario would Rangers lose the tribunal but not be guilty of "cheating"?
Nah, see above <laugh>
Stirring it up a bit here <whistle> "Cheating", by my definition at least, is the deliberate action of violating rules, with full knowledge that...
I wouldn't pay the slightest attention to super. He's either a wum, a ******, or possibly both.
That of course, and the fact that the debate is over <ok>
<laugh><laugh>.
He was a fanny then n aw <whistle>