Separate names with a comma.
We all hope that some of their decisions over the past 18 months have been poor to say the least.
It’s relevant to what I was asked. Some won’t have a word said against the owners. let’s just hope they use the Clarke money wisely.
I was responding to a question
I have never mentioned the monorail mind so not sure I have lost my head.
No competent striker for 18 months, humiliating your support and selling your best player for relative peanuts. Aye great management that.
Thank you
Perhaps ott but some supporters need to open their eyes. :-) hopefully we can use the money wisely whatever our views on the sale
I thought you were a decent poster and have enjoyed previous correspondence but kind of seeing why you ain’t that popular otr so to speak....
I’m no representative for RTG and some of that patter is pretty daft but was told to **** off back to RTG. If it’s not there maybe it’s been...
That’s the point- if we had owners who would invest in a striker or two we wouldn’t be in this position. We could play hardball and hopefully a...
I think still too low given the market.
I haven’t shouted. I have a view and being told to **** off because I post on RTG. Charming :-)
You don’t know either. It’s being reported £15m upfront. If it’s £15m it very poor. If it’s £25m it’s good business. im not sure what’s wrong in...
I have been told to **** off - have a look.
Selling an asset for way below its value is great business
Look I respect you as a poster but I have no idea but we don’t need to sell that’s the point. howver given the fees go players with less ability...
If we sell Clarke for £30m no one will argue as the lad deserves to be in the premier league. selling for £15m so we can quickly fund a striker...
It’s not one or the other.
He has 2 years left on his contract we don’t need to sell at £15m particularly when a good proportion goes to spurs. we need the owners to buy a...