Separate names with a comma.
Told you so.
Someone we won't beat
Big clubs can go **** themselves
I get what you're saying but I very strongly disagree. As you say, we have very different views. Personally I feel the whole purpose of any sport...
Bulgarian 'fans' giving nazi salutes seems particularly idiotic considering Hitler considered slavic people (i.e. anyone East of Germany) as...
Next week will deal with itself, just enjoy the good win :smiley-finger007:
How about now, @Saintmagic?
I'm all for it, don't make rugby (and cricket) such a closed shop
Well in terms of top teams I'd say they are: England, South Africa, Scotland, Wales, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, France... If each team...
Namibia and Georgia were examples, it could be USA or Canada or whoever.
No, no, no, I don't mean that, sorry. I'm just saying play one emerging nation per year. Or maybe two if you're feeling generous. Say one year...
I don't have the entire rugby calendar to hand, but I imagine it's probably possible. Certainly is in cricket at least.
Did you even read what I said? I said once a year against a developing nation in cricket, so something like that in rugby as well. Fitting in one...
My point is, the top teams should play the smaller teams more often rather than just once every 4 years to help their development and give them...
You're pretty much proving my point
I wasn't being exact, three weeks, two weeks, it makes little difference. My point still stands. And time after time I mean every world cup, the...
I'm all for the best teams winning and the minnows getting knocked out in the group stage, where I have an issue is with the 66 3 scorelines. And...
Yes, but playing their own level means they'll never get better because you need more than getting pasted once every four years to get better.
It is very good, thank you
I meant outside of a world cup... And on a more regular basis than once every four years.
