Separate names with a comma.
Hope everyone manages to stay safe :emoticon-0148-yes:
But you just told us that the Police portrayed the whole group as far right and that it was a disgusting lie. Are you saying that the group were...
Ok I'll join you on that at least. Ridiculous.
I'm not sure I've heard the first part of what you've said, but yeah fair enough. Completely agree otherwise. The statue should not have been...
And subsequently charged 4 people.
Okay, BLM then? Unless you're claiming that the BLM protest was fine (exempting the statue coming down of course). In which case I'd agree with you.
Fine, I'm not getting that petty. Excluding the obvious violence from both BLM and the far-right lot, perhaps you can tell me what was illegal...
No. I condemned the actions of BLM. Why would I think this is okay? Wrong. You're trying to talk about something you clearly know nothing about.
Isn't it bloody amazing how when you want it to be, everything is 'nuanced' but in matters like this which are plain as day, everything has to be...
Technically, yes, the protest is justified in the eyes of the law, and the UK we do allow contextual factors and mitigating circumstances to have...
Well there is no distinction within the law, though the law can be interpreted contextually. But are you seriously telling me that if you see a...
You're creating false equivalencies though. No two things here are the same and like it or not, these people do and should have a right to a...
Still none the wiser to be honest mate. Specifics?
5 charged after the anti lockdown protest. 4 charged after the BLM protests. What exactly is the problem?
To be fair to him a fair few of us (myself included) could fit that description on occasion <laugh>
You can keep mentioning it as being fake or whatever you like mate, but until you demonstrate the slightest ounce of proof it'll only ever be made...
I said something basically to that effect 10 days ago in the BBC thread. Completely agree
Yeah I know. I've literally agreed with you this entire thread, and said as much.
Of course it is semantics. If something is 'socially frowned upon' it doesn't necessarily mean a majority hold that view. By definition it might...
Arguing over semantics despite agreeing on the original point. Just can't resist can you. Standard.
