Separate names with a comma.
Now, now. Don't be coy, you know exactly what it means and exactly what I'm saying. You might not agree with it, but you know what it means....
So what you are saying is that that is never shortened and used in common parlance as "know your enemy"..?
That's great thanks. So bear with me, I'm sure you've gathered by now I'm a bit slow. Torbett was convicted because there were three people...
:emoticon-0101-sadsm There's a time-honoured saying - "Know your enemies". Perhaps you've heard of it..? So to deal with Celtic fans one has...
It's there for emphasis, just in case you MISS it. Peppering evEry woRd iN A seNtence wiTh capitAls Would loOk liKe thiS. I don't see any...
In a civil case, yes. As you have already pointed out a different legal standard applies in a criminal case, but in THIS criminal case there was...
Trying to deflect away from the actual subject by highlighting that I don't know the legal terms used in a Scottish Court of Law is hiding behind...
So NO actual physical evidence then - yes..? Testimony from witnesses' found to be 'credible', balanced against denials from a witness found to...
Fine, semantics, but fine anyway - So Torbett was convicted because the evidence was found to be beyond reasonable doubt..?
OK, let's take this slowly.. On what 'evidence' was Torbett convicted..??
Obfuscate, Deflect and Deny - it's the Celtic way. But you're right about one thing, the shadow of a man who protected a *****phile to protect...
Gotta love the logic that if the only proof is one person's word against another's then there is no proof.. Stating the bleedin' obvious here,...
Hmmm - let's be generous and say that you are being a tad economical with the truth here. That one man - Hugh Birt - gave evidence in Court that:...
Absolutely - because it is about the man who protected a *****phile yet is held up as a shining example of the breed by one set of football...
Quite apart from the fact that the man in question was being touted for a posthumous knighthood, he is held up by one third of the city as a hero...
Big Jock Knew - that's a fact. What's your problem with that exactly..??
No, ******ed is not having a proper argument for your viewpoint and your pish about it is beneath you is a smokescreen for the fact that you have...
Don't pat your forehead bud, actually I do need it explained because I see no correlation between the two. I don't see any Rangers fans...
Presumably as you are on here you were found 'Not Guilty'..?? :emoticon-0110-tongu To quote Ian Hislop: "If that's Justice I'm a Banana"......
Where in any of those reports does it say that the Queen knew..? Where in any of those reports does it say that this guy worked for Rangers...
