Separate names with a comma.
Can I ask y'all... Do you think this is anti-Celtic, pro-Rangers, anti-Catholic or just incompetent behaviour from the SFA?
See I agree with that. Boogy defo... Diouf maybe not so but dont care about him
Didnt know that Mick.....my my... I can see the dossier from McBribe the now.... titled "The Establishment"
Imagine what you could have won.... i.e 6 match ban for Boogs and a 6 match ban for Diouf... The irony of that outcome would have been those 2...
We aint gonna agree on this one... The spirit of the SFA ban wasnt concurrent. Celtic picked up on a loophole in the rule book and the wording in...
Ah ok.... Well clearly I would like McBride to make a **** of himself and implode.... But at the same time i would like to use this as a catalyst...
Not missing the point....you answered my question. You would have went with the 6 games ban in the Scottish Cup.... I have no idea what the...
Sorry Reb's dont get that one...
ST - you know my take on all this. I think Diouf and Boogs should be given a greater punishment....BUT what would be more suitable? I mean they...
Let me ask you a question....what would have been a better punishment for Diouf and Boogie?
I agree with you...but he needs to show evidence.
Cracker <laugh> Bet he winked at them afterwards
Nah prefer my edits
Mick, thats total ****ing pish.... What ban would have been more fitting and reasonable? Again I think they should have got a harsher...
Under the SFA rules what do you feel would be a more fitting ban? I agree that Boogie and Diouf should have had a harsher penalty but the rule...
[IMG]
<laugh> did he play with Ulrika's johnson?
naw...Ive been up te ma nuts in guts too.....but that doesnt count either
Ive apologised for my Papist erm bassist erm baptist remark....
Theres an arguement that the SFA have actually over stepped the mark by giving fines rather than longer bans.... The bans can only be relevant to...
