Separate names with a comma.
So who does get involved in a controversy then? Let the fans of each teams fight between it?
Why not?
LOL @ a neutral not being allowed an opinion. I assume your 5000+ posts in a space of a few months are all filled with nonsensical ramblings.
Tickets courtesy of uncle 'arry in exchange for dome tax dodging advice ?????
Neutral = non-Spurs and non-PAOK fan. I support neither team. Also Stan Collymore said it was a very harsh decision and some geezer on Twitter...
Surprised that goal didn't stand.
Different stage of play. Turn the tables around and you would be fuming.
Spurs fans saying it was a penalty. Neutrals saying it never was. Says all you need to know.
It's already been proven that it hit his stomach. Nothing more to say.
Never a penalty, nor a red card. Referee trying to win this game for Spurs.
He has a hell of a job to do with the likes of Adam, Bellamy, Gerrard, Henderson, Kuyt, Lucas, Rodriguez and Suarez in the team.
What I stated was the exact opposite. They are criminals because they broke the law and the change of the law does not mean that they no longer...
It used to be and they broke it when it was active. Don't try and be clever with me.
You sir, are a ****ing idiot. Lionel Messi's priorities are with Barcelona and rightly so. Also our current Barca side would tear apart the 1999...
What exactly is Kenny Dalglish' footballing philosophy?
Says the guy with the picture of a girl on her knees licking the rim of a tyre in his signature.
So if a particular law is abolished, does that mean all criminals who broke it should be pardoned and released from prison? No, they still...
She's alright, but I've had better.
