Separate names with a comma.
BBC “largely against the run of play” Oh how strange
More I see the Burnley goal.more I think it should've stood seelt went down a bit easy I'd been upset if that was not given for us
Tight relatively scrappy affair as predicted which has gone back and forth a bit in terms of who's looked better. Would say they've definitely...
We have 3 quality 9's imo. If people mean a guaranteed goals 9 then we may need north of 70 million pound.
we are on top but Granit and the two wide men are not at their best, our counterattacking is too slow atm , a change or two on 60 minutes might be...
Better side imo don’t know if I’m being harsh to say I’m slightly disappointed? Bit rushed at times, lack of composure on the ball and missed some...
Marv sorry to tell you but he's a bottler.... when the highlights come up see who's not there doing his job and im not talking about just the goals...
He has played some quality balls through the lines with pace.
We need more threat up front; Kvistgaarden for Marcondes perhaps and/or Jurásek for Crnac who has again failed to get going.
3 games in. It's ok for me.
Even when we had a 95% possession he was still all for Burnley, don't know who it is but he's ****e
More
We’re still getting used to stuff and working things out. It takes time. Look at Ipswich, who are meant to be walking the league. Think we take...
[ATTACH]
I think we desperately need a quality AM and some wingers.
is this a game where le fee can come in for sadiki? le fee will still buzz about but gives us more creativity
Exactly, Sunderland are doing exactly what we should be doing in a tight away game … … we're there to win, not entertain the TV viewers <laugh>
Some things never change.
hopefully step up a gear in second half like last week Mayenda should of scored they are there for the taken if we step up
Fernandes seems to trying to do Hollywood stuff when simple passes would be more effective. Impressed by Wood.
