Separate names with a comma.
He's had money throughout his tenure and also not selling key players is backing. He's been backed to the maximum value possible and that has...
Wow your boys really set themselves up nicely for everyone to laugh at their broken bones in this one. [MEDIA]
Longstaff puts in the kind of hard yards you are in need of. If any of you have any club connections then let them know.
He has been backed and I actually never said backing has to be continuous. It will be and has been continuous though... it's just the fact he's...
If he's had no money mind.... Chelsea spent a billion on one window ... even Eddie Howe has had 400 million in 3 years.
There see a separate argument. At no point have I said money isn't required. The money wasn't available though because he'd already had it....
There no contradiction you just want to argue a separate point entirely. He's had all the money available and more. Again you are being selective...
Just chatting with Spurs fans and apparently Ange has had a net spend of virtually nothing..
<laugh> I agree
He hasn't had zero.... if he'd had 370 million in one window or across all of them he's has the same amount of backing in value. If you're saying...
Wow so his net spend is zero ?
He needs replacing
Edited for you
How much money has this Australian had gents ?
Tbf on recent form Leicester beat West Ham and drew with Brighton..two teams we've lost to. I do think Newcastle will win at home though...
You claimed the manager hasn't been backed but he's been backed to the maximum whether it was one 2 or all the windows the money was spent in....
I'm saying everything covered in the 3 points I've referred you to. Howes been backed to the Max.. see point 3
That's selective. He's had the maximum amount possible over his tenure.
Nothing was deflected
He hasn't had zero.
