Another Look at Lazar Marković

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
moreinjuredthanowen said:
Ah no sorry there's 6/7 good sides given how utd spanked us despite us playing well how well Southampton play and then there's arsenal, west ham and such

Just because the top two are another level doesn't mean we can rank those with sunderland
Click to expand...

I get what you are saying MITO but you have to remember Chelsea couldn't beat this Sunderland team. The same Sunderland team pushed Mancity to the end just last week. At the end of the day 3 points will always be 3 points. I am happy because I am seeing a young player showing the potential and skills befitting his price tag. Now the key as you say is more performances like that over a longer period.

Is there anyone thinking we should let Markovic play that RWB role as it builds on his tactical discipline especially when we lose the ball? Remove Gerrard and Borini for Studge and Sterling and that is one rapid team we've got in this formation.
 
Yet Sunderland were god awful on the day due to their own set up

They played too deep so yeah great the lad got the one goal and others could've had more but in the end other games don't really count Sunderland were flat compared to games I saw them in
 
Happy that Markovic has improved over the past few weeks. Still has a long way to go and I look forward to seeing him progress.

We haven't seen him hit top form yet - he was brilliant at Partizan and Benfica. With Lallana and Gerrard both injured, I hope we do see Marko play in a more advanced position.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The artist JerryChristmas
He's very quick

The End.

A lad with his pace will always cause a problem or two, but from what I've seen of him, he's not all that.
 
moreinjuredthanowen said:
Yet Sunderland were god awful on the day due to their own set up

They played too deep so yeah great the lad got the one goal and others could've had more but in the end other games don't really count Sunderland were flat compared to games I saw them in
Click to expand...

Come on MITO we've had enough miserable ****e this season....we played ****ing well on Saturday and should have won comfortably (and I mean by 4 or 5). Sunderland aren't the best but they sure as hell ain't the worst. Sunderlands set up helped ours but others have this season and we've all too often failed to play anywhere near that level. Enjoy the good performances as much as you hate the bad <ok> The game will grind you down otherwise la <laugh>
 
Tobes said:
Wake me up when he picks up the Balon D'Or lad....


zzzzzzzzzz
Click to expand...

So there are two groups of players:

  1. The best player in La Liga
  2. Everyone else

<laugh> that's how a [HASHTAG]#bitter[/HASHTAG] doesn't have to face the [HASHTAG]#reality[/HASHTAG] of his own players
 
astroturfnaut said:
So there are two groups of players:

  1. The best player in La Liga
  2. Everyone else

<laugh> that's how a [HASHTAG]#bitter[/HASHTAG] doesn't have to face the [HASHTAG]#reality[/HASHTAG] of his own players
Click to expand...

Yet again you define your own stupidty with drivel.
 
moreinjuredthanowen said:
All I'm saying is evidence of the eyes is rarely wrong and for whatever reason the boy was really poor and never showed even a glimpse of oace even in his first 3 months. No at least he looks decent.
Click to expand...
The point is that people were writing him off after that poor start.
We know it's the owners' policy to buy young players with potential for the future. That's a risky policy in many ways- some promising kids never make the grade- but the players need time to grow into their game and shouldn't be judged too soon. Some will make it, others won't, even the best judges of potential will get it wrong often enough.
 
saintanton said:
The point is that people were writing him off after that poor start.
We know it's the owners' policy to buy young players with potential for the future. That's a risky policy in many ways- some promising kids never make the grade- but the players need time to grow into their game and shouldn't be judged too soon. Some will make it, others won't, even the best judges of potential will get it wrong often enough.
Click to expand...

I was squarely on the fence with Markovic, still am tbh. He's been good recently so we know he can do it but so far at Liverpool you would have to say the recent performances are the abnormal. Given time, he could become a very good player but he needs to do a lot more yet.
 
Waterdude said:
I think we have been very premature on a lot our signings. We cannot really truly judge them till next season. If we turn this season around Rodgers will have had his first two seasons in one. I feel we should concentrate on Europa as that would appear to be our best chance of CL league, as I think we are too farbehind in league. Our Feb fixtures are scary!!
Click to expand...

I would say that most of the criticism has been levelled at Balotelli and Lambert as in Studges absence we are lacking strikers.
 
Wecanplayyoueveryweek said:
Sunderland are draw specialist.. they were looking for a draw, unfortunately it backfired.<cheers>
Click to expand...

too true... both winders ins a supposed 4-3-3 were playing as full backs virtually it made it quite easy for both our wing backs really.

and coutinho too...

in reality had it been 0-0 on 35 mins we'd have been talking about potentally lots of missed chances and yet another failure upfront... as it was markovic did well, made a good run and took his chance. Fair play for that.... now do it more than once! .

thats why gerrez's statement above is also quite sensible on the topic.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back