British Politics spam thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
^^^^

Yup ...

... not to mention adding millions in costs to any British business exporting into Europe ...

Still at least the NHS benefitted as promised by the Big Red Bus ... oh wait

Brain dead Remoaners only ever consider one side of the argument.

When they refer to British businesses exporting to Europe (they actually mean the EU), they conveniently neglect to mention that just 8% of British businesses trade with Europe and that the paperwork is forced on them by a spiteful Brussels Politburo that is punishing us for torpedoing their Leftist Budget plans.

They talk about the costs of trade with the EU like it is the only place that we trade. We export £11bn in pharmaceuticals to the USA that, if we were in the EU, would be subject to 100% tariffs. Our agricultural exports to the EU account for less than 1% of GDP and we import four times as much from the EU. So the protectionist racket is actually hurting EU farmers trading with us. All of our exports to the EU are subject to EU red tape (punishment for leaving) whilst just 2% of New Zealand exports to the EU are subject to EU red tape.

According to the World Bank, the economic output of Europe has fallen by ten percent in the last decade to 23% of global output as the United States of France project becomes less and less globally relevant.

The NHS (the Communist Health Service) has been failing for over fifty years but the brain dead British public still believe all the myths about how great it is rather than look at the actual facts. If they want good healthcare then they need to adopt better systems like those in many European countries where health is a public/private partnership and billions are not wasted on centralised bureaucrats who cure no ills.
 
The funniest thing about it was that if their asylum claims were subsequently successful then we were obligated to fly them back ... and compensate them.

... but the 'entrepreneurs' behind the flights stood to make similar fortunes as the hotel chains with 100% bookings ...

The cheaper alternative, by a country mile, would have been to reverse the civil service cuts that have been happening for decades and simply process and investigate the asylum claims much quicker ... but no 'entrepreneur' is making a fortune out of that - no non-competitive lucrative contracts to hand out to 'business acquaintances' ...

....but Starmer wouldn't torpedo the boats!!!... Gaaahhhh!!
I'm sure someone has made a few bob out of the whole fiasco.

Rwanda was doomed from the start. The legal wrangling would have carried on for years.

I still think camps administered by the army would be the cheapest, safest option.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
You hear what you want to hear, because you have climbed into an echo chamber and lost all contact with reality. You are a brainwashed victim of Musk and other assorted oligarchs' campaign to get dumb spanners like you to blame immigrants for the mess the world is in.

Edit: you also outed yourself as a nonce years ago
And you don't? Endlessly banging on about how it is unfair to taint anyone foreign with the same brush yet happy to do so yourself.

Funny how similar your comments are to when I asked my local MP why he didn't vote for the enquiry into grooming gangs he came back with a similar reply to you and blamed Reform for stirring up islamophobia. Yet all of a sudden I am a brainwashed victim of a car salesman?

Here's a prediction for you. By the next election a) the muslims would have taken over The Green Party and use that as their route into power or b) the Islamic Party of Great Britain will try again under a different name to wrest power from Labour, the Greens and anyone else who has harbored their vile activists. Whatever the outcome the country will be split not on political grounds but racial and religious ones. Depending on where you live your councillors, local government officials and member of parliament will be muslims. This will mean the majority of our major cities and towns with only smaller rural areas remaining predominately white British controlled. All of it engineered, all of it intentional, all of it excused in the name of inclusivity by traitors.

Edit: if you can't tell the difference between Wummery, humour and facts then maybe you should apply for a job at The Guardian. Outed myself as a nonce FFS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
The funniest thing about it was that if their asylum claims were subsequently successful then we were obligated to fly them back ... and compensate them.

... but the 'entrepreneurs' behind the flights stood to make similar fortunes as the hotel chains with 100% bookings ...

The cheaper alternative, by a country mile, would have been to reverse the civil service cuts that have been happening for decades and simply process and investigate the asylum claims much quicker ... but no 'entrepreneur' is making a fortune out of that - no non-competitive lucrative contracts to hand out to 'business acquaintances' ...

....but Starmer wouldn't torpedo the boats!!!... Gaaahhhh!!

Hilarious. Another post from the fantasy world of asylum seeker knowledge ‘Refugees Welcome’ banner waving.

There is no genuine asylum seeker coming ashore in a small boat to this country. Perhaps you should read Section 24 of the Immigration Act. They have all crossed countries where they could have sought asylum, it seems large numbers of them destroy any documentation that they possess as it would see their claims immediately rejected; and they rely on Leftie lawyers (a huge waste of taxpayers’ money) to come up with ridiculous reasons why they should be allowed to stay. Genuine asylum seekers would come here by legitimate means (e.g. ferry, plane) with documentation to prove their claim.

How does this reversing of civil service cuts work? There have not been any civil service cuts – even when politicians promised them. The biggest waste of taxpayers’ money in this country is the bloated civil service overloaded with bureaucrats that do nothing all day but travel around to attend pointless meetings where more paperwork is shuffled and no actual work is done. Make me PM and I will axe 100,000 of them on Day One and make the remainder show up on Day Two and do some work or face the sack.

It seems that supporters of the incompetent Liebour regime have torpedoed Stalin 2.0 to replace him with someone equally (at least) incompetent. If they wanted to keep Stalin 2.0 then they should have protest voted for Reform in Makerfield to leave Burnham with just Manchester as his fiefdom.
 
You must log in or register to see media

Stupid gammon deserved it for going to Tenerife
The way that Daily Mail headline reads, the dead man was out celebrating his birthday with the Senegalese immigrant’s wife. Perhaps she had thought as an easy way of getting into the UK – get rid of her husband and take up with a Brit. <laugh>
 
Hilarious. Another post from the fantasy world of asylum seeker knowledge ‘Refugees Welcome’ banner waving.

There is no genuine asylum seeker coming ashore in a small boat to this country. Perhaps you should read Section 24 of the Immigration Act. They have all crossed countries where they could have sought asylum, it seems large numbers of them destroy any documentation that they possess as it would see their claims immediately rejected; and they rely on Leftie lawyers (a huge waste of taxpayers’ money) to come up with ridiculous reasons why they should be allowed to stay. Genuine asylum seekers would come here by legitimate means (e.g. ferry, plane) with documentation to prove their claim.

How does this reversing of civil service cuts work? There have not been any civil service cuts – even when politicians promised them. The biggest waste of taxpayers’ money in this country is the bloated civil service overloaded with bureaucrats that do nothing all day but travel around to attend pointless meetings where more paperwork is shuffled and no actual work is done. Make me PM and I will axe 100,000 of them on Day One and make the remainder show up on Day Two and do some work or face the sack.

It seems that supporters of the incompetent Liebour regime have torpedoed Stalin 2.0 to replace him with someone equally (at least) incompetent. If they wanted to keep Stalin 2.0 then they should have protest voted for Reform in Makerfield to leave Burnham with just Manchester as his fiefdom.

Think I'd rather trust the Home Office figures on genuine refugees and asylum approvals than your 'knowledge' from the Brighouse & Rastrick Roundabout Painters Rotary Club ... no disrespect.

If you'd bothered to look, it would also have saved you the drafting of yet another meandering self-indulgent monologue of unadulterated mouth farting <laugh> ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toby
Think I'd rather trust the Home Office figures on genuine refugees and asylum approvals than your 'knowledge' from the Brighouse & Rastrick Roundabout Painters Rotary Club ... no disrespect.

If you'd bothered to look, it would also have saved you the drafting of yet another meandering self-indulgent monologue of unadulterated mouth farting <laugh> ...
Perhaps you would like to quote me those Home Office statistics to save me wasting my time going and looking. One number that I do know off the top of my head is that the number of successful final asylum claims in 2025 was 42% – I saw that on a graph in The Telegraph the other day. The reality is that you would have to go and look statistics up because you know nothing that you are not fed by the Establishment and just blindly believe.

Are you aggregating the statistics of those still here given leave to apply for asylum (arriving illegally) with those that arrived by legal means such as work visas, study visas, visitor visas and schemes for people coming from places like Ukraine? The Establishment doctor the official statistics so that simpletons like you just believe the headline numbers.

I bet that the vast majority of accepted claims were not arriving on the RNLI trafficking scheme that dolts like you and Toby fund.

When it comes to unadulterated mouth farting, you and Toby are neck and neck in the Gold medal race.
 
United States – border with Central American country from where many South/Central American ‘asylum seekers’ arrive.

Germany – allegedly the destination of choice for ‘asylum seekers’ since Mutti openly invited them years ago.

France, Spain, Italy – countries bordering the Mediterranean Sea that ‘asylum seekers’ cross seeking the gold-paved streets of the EU.

United Kingdom – no border with any country from which ‘asylum seekers’ can genuinely arrive without having first crossed at least one other country in which they could have requested asylum.
Well done Einstein for telling us what has been general knowledge for many years <doh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toby