Transfer Rumours Summer 2026 Transfer Thread…

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
All the chat about Tymon being a good option as he'd be quite cheap, are we sure about that?

Swansea aren't skint, he's arguably the best left back in the league and has a lengthy contract.

How much would it take to get him?
Ultimately a lot will depend on whether the player wants to push the move.

Premier league football is a hell of a carrot to dangle.
To be fair, the bit about being £6 million over the limit purely due to promotion bonuses is news to me. I just assumed it was because of regular wages and transfer fees over the last three years.

According to that same BBC article, clubs on average pay around £10-15 million in promotion bonuses upon promotion to the Premier League. If that’s anything to go by, we were probably well below the £39 million limit of acceptable losses over the last three years this season until we got promoted.

We may have been sitting at a £30-35 million loss over the last three years before the play-off final and it’s jumped to £45 million overnight.

Acun was saying we needed to recoup funds by July at the Q&A prior to Norwich.

Though I don't doubt the deficit has probably grown due to promotion bonuses, far more than was potentially offset by the increased revenue resulting from the playoff campaign.

Maybe it is possible that a smallish projected deficit became significantly larger one, and that ffp would have been satisfied had we benefitted from the increased playoff revenue, but without the increased contractural liabilities that came with promotion?
 
Last edited:
Wonder if this is someone we’re looking at aswell if we’re looking at the Brazilian market for youngsters with high upside

please stop, we have enough posters on here already with 'if it was up to me' or I'd like'types of posts. If everyone did it there'd be no room for PSR talk on the transfer thread
 
Can’t the bonuses be contracted for payment in July?

There’s some porky pies being fed by the club I think.

I’m glad it is somewhat being reported correctly by the media in the last 24 hrs as I was going to mention it yesterday.

Promotion bonuses etc can be deferred into the next reporting period by promotion successful clubs. Leeds did this 18 months ago to stay compliant, as their promotion bonuses would have seen them fail their PSR reporting, despite everything being well to that point. There’s a specific rule to prevent exactly what we think is occurring, clubs should not be penalized for success within weeks.


As a few other posters have said, if this was PSR non compliance, I don’t see how this would come out right now, as reporting isn’t due until March/April next year.

It can only be the ongoing liabilities and more late payment issues, as the EFL has been overseeing this on an ongoing basis, which would seemingly be a cashflow issue, unless it actually was going to completely screw us for PSR and we haven’t covered these ongoing liabilities with revenue calcs.

Either way, it seems we were likely going to fall short whether promoted or not and it’s a little bit of misdirection from the club…
 
There’s some porky pies being fed by the club I think.

I’m glad it is somewhat being reported correctly by the media in the last 24 hrs as I was going to mention it yesterday.

Promotion bonuses etc can be deferred into the next reporting period by promotion successful clubs. Leeds did this 18 months ago to stay compliant, as their promotion bonuses would have seen them fail their PSR reporting, despite everything being well to that point. There’s a specific rule to prevent exactly what we think is occurring, clubs should not be penalized for success within weeks.


As a few other posters have said, if this was PSR non compliance, I don’t see how this would come out, as reporting isn’t due until March/April next year.

It can only be the ongoing liabilities and late payment issue, which would seemingly be a cashflow issue, unless it actually was going to completely screw us for PSR.

Either way, it seems we were likely doing to fall short whether promoted or not and it’s a little bit of misdirection from the club imo.

The only way I could imagine it is a PSR issue is that the EFL has been monitoring our accounts, but that would seem unfair to ping us on particularly as they signed off on the deals.

There is definitely something strange going on with it all though.

Also, the only 'promotion' element to this that I could imagine could be the case would be the add-ons rather than the wage bonus (unless you can defer both?) 2m owed for Omur as he's coming into the last year of his deal; I can't imagine for any other player that an add-on for promotion would be material particularly when spread over the remaining years of their contract. (e.g. even if say, Kamara, Belloumi, Giles, Pandur and Hughes all have promotion add-ons, I can't imagine the amount recogniseable this year would amount to much more than 1-2m combined). Since Acun was flagging it prior to Norwich, I suppose we must have been very borderline anyway, which was why we tried shifting Akintola, so I guess it could be feasible that we were perhaps 0.5-1m over the limit, and that with the Omur add on plus the amount owing for all those other players (could throw in Joseph too perhaps) that that just about makes up the 6m being quoted everywhere.

But that still comes back to the original point of why that's an issue now, and not when the accounts are submitted come March. Unless we're 'self-reporting' to get ahead of it? Very confusing in any case.
 
The only way I could imagine it is a PSR issue is that the EFL has been monitoring our accounts, but that would seem unfair to ping us on particularly as they signed off on the deals.

There is definitely something strange going on with it all though.

Also, the only 'promotion' element to this that I could imagine could be the case would be the 2m owed for Omur as he's coming into the last year of his deal; I can't imagine for any other player that an add-on for promotion would be material particularly when spread over the remaining years of their contract. (e.g. even if say, Kamara, Belloumi, Giles, Pandur and Hughes all have promotion add-ons, I can't imagine the amount recogniseable this year would amount to much more than 1-2m combined). Since Acun was flagging it prior to Norwich, I suppose we must have been very borderline anyway, which was why we tried shifting Akintola, so I guess it could be feasible that we were perhaps 0.5-1m over the limit, and that with the Omur add on plus the amount owing for all those other players (could throw in Joseph too perhaps) that that just about makes up the 6m being quoted everywhere.

But that still comes back to the original point of why that's an issue now, and not when the accounts are submitted come March. Unless we're 'self-reporting' to get ahead of it? Very confusing in any case.

The reporting period hasn’t even finished yet. Final accounts wouldn’t have been locked off and fully finalized, audits haven’t occurred.

There’s no way this is a PSR issue imo. They can’t do it live. Companies are allowed time to gather their accounts correctly.

As I said in the other post, all promotion bonuses are able to be deferred into our first PL season. There is a specific rule for it for promoted clubs agreed to by the EFL and PL.

The non compliance has to be for a third reason. We are seemingly chasing money up front also, which says this is cashflow related also imo.

It’s more than likely we owe someone ongoing liabilities by the end of the reporting period and haven’t as yet paid it. Which is strange as cashflow can be solved a million ways. It’s not normally a problem where you’d need to sell assets.


It’s a weird one that I suspect is a bit on the nose and are misdirecting the fans.
 
The reporting period hasn’t even finished yet. Final accounts wouldn’t have been locked off and finally finalized, audits haven’t occurred.

There’s no way this is a PSR issue imo. They can’t do it live.

As I said in the other posts, all promotion bonuses are able to be deferred into our first PL season.

The non compliance has to be for a third reason. We are seemingly chasing money up front also, which says this is cashflow related also.

Yeah I'm agreeing, the only way it could even be known is if we've essentially self-reported or the EFL has access to our accounts and is flagging it as a risk - which would seem weird as they signed off on the deals and are thus 'complicit'. I've also never known of a club running foul of PSR ahead of the end of a financial period - as you say, the year hasn't even finished yet. It reminds me a little of two years ago when we all knew we had to sell Jaden and Greaves by the end of June to comply, and maybe the only reason this is making headlines is we're now in the PL.

Even promotion add-ons? That's interesting. There seems a lot of confusion about what can and can't be deferred - even Maguire was initially suggesting that our PSR non-compliance is promotion related.

If it's cash flow related surely we just borrow against the first PL instalment rather than scramble to sell players? If it was cashflow related we'd be at risk of an embargo, not a points penalty, so nothing is really adding up.
 
Yeah I'm agreeing, the only way it could even be known is if we've essentially self-reported or the EFL has access to our accounts and is flagging it as a risk - which would seem weird as they signed off on the deals and are thus 'complicit'. I've also never known of a club running foul of PSR ahead of the end of a financial period - as you say, the year hasn't even finished yet. It reminds me a little of two years ago when we all knew we had to sell Jaden and Greaves by the end of June to comply, and maybe the only reason this is making headlines is we're now in the PL.

Even promotion add-ons? That's interesting. There seems a lot of confusion about what can and can't be deferred - even Maguire was initially suggesting that our PSR non-compliance is promotion related.

If it's cash flow related surely we just borrow against the first PL instalment rather than scramble to sell players? If it was cashflow related we'd be at risk of an embargo, not a points penalty, so nothing is really adding up.

Promotion add ons are capitalized onto the remaining asset book value.

It’s a cashflow issue only in terms of profit and loss.

Bonuses (which fall under wages) can be deferred until next season as Leeds did with their £19m liability.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jim the Tiger
Promotion add ons are capitalized onto the remaining asset book value.

It’s a cashflow issue only in terms of profit and loss.

Bonuses (which fall under wages) can be deferred until next season as Leeds did with their £19m liability.

Yeah understood, that's why I thought Omur could be the main culprit as he has such little time left on his deal but a substantial promotion add-on. The 2m add on would be effectively being split between this year and next (think next year's his last year?)

Guess we just wait until the clock hits midnight on June 30 and see what comes of it, it's all so confusing before then.
 
The reporting period hasn’t even finished yet. Final accounts wouldn’t have been locked off and fully finalized, audits haven’t occurred.

There’s no way this is a PSR issue imo. They can’t do it live. Companies are allowed time to gather their accounts correctly.

As I said in the other post, all promotion bonuses are able to be deferred into our first PL season. There is a specific rule for it for promoted clubs agreed to by the EFL and PL.

The non compliance has to be for a third reason. We are seemingly chasing money up front also, which says this is cashflow related also imo.

It’s more than likely we owe someone ongoing liabilities by the end of the reporting period and haven’t as yet paid it. Which is strange as cashflow can be solved a million ways. It’s not normally a problem where you’d need to sell assets.


It’s a weird one that I suspect is a bit on the nose and are misdirecting the fans.
The 25/26 season’s accounts won’t be published until next year but the club’s accounting department will surely be live tracking the losses and will know if we’re over the £39 million loss threshold over the last three seasons?

My understanding of it is that the club know we’re around £45 million in the red over the last three seasons and we need to get that number down to £39 million or lower before the end of this month. If we don’t, then when we publish our accounts next March/April, we’ll be in breach of PSR and the EFL will act accordingly. In other words, if we are in breach of PSR, we won’t find out our sanction until next spring anyway.
 
Coventry City have today submitted a second bid for Carl Rushworth, worth £26.5 + £5m in potential add ons.

Brighton are now asking for a £40m.

He's obviously a great keeper, but that's crazy money.
It just shows how stupid Coventry are £26m for Rushworth ,they could get Phillips off us for £18m.