OK so you would say Palace, forest and Leeds who were around the relegation places may well be in trouble again?
I'm not sure by your metrics how any season can be stronger or weaker if the main risk of relegation is determined by being at risk of relegation previously. Clearly seasons can be distinguished so looking at other factors is pretty relevant.
I wasn't setting parameters, again I was stating the key indicators that can be measured. Look at Leicester winning the league and dissect the set of factors that led that to happening for instance.
This began because GFAW asked for a subset of teams at risk of going down, which was then dismissed "just cos".
I'd be interested if we DO stay up, if the rationale then applies to us, that there's zero chance of relegation because of the same reasons now being applied to why Sunderland, forest, Leeds, Palace or Fulham can't go down.
Just not sure why some are so desperate to insist we're going down already.