Southampton v Boro - 2nd leg

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Or not.

A specific rule was introduced, but in the usual FA / EFL way fudged it by giving absolutely no guidance on the punishment for those breaking that rule. In the only previous case (before the specific rule was introduced) Leeds were fined 200,000 does that set the precedent?
Of course it doesn't because that was before the rule was introduced.
 
You must log in or register to see images


'they' would tell you its a fake post
wake up people
 
I was just listening to TS. A Middlesbrough fan put it succinctly... he said over the ywpolegs they didnt win.... BUT they Southampton have broken a rule and if it had happened mid season and they were docked 10 points for the infringement they would have missed the playoffs. as Jordan says, if they get fined 500k it means nothing, if it means a 10 point deduction next time in the Championship it mends nothing,...
 
I was just listening to TS. A Middlesbrough fan put it succinctly... he said over the ywpolegs they didnt win.... BUT they Southampton have broken a rule and if it had happened mid season and they were docked 10 points for the infringement they would have missed the playoffs. as Jordan says, if they get fined 500k it means nothing, if it means a 10 point deduction next time in the Championship it mends nothing,...

Not been confirmed but apparently
One of the other clubs with evidence of southampton spying is wrexham
 
  • Like
Reactions: will
Not been confirmed but apparently
One of the other clubs with evidence of southampton spying is wrexham
I have just seen a video of a Sky Sports reporter stood in the exact same location it is alleged the spy was stood. It is literally a road leading to a golf club. I dont see how this is going to be anything more than a ticking off a fine for unsporting behaviour. Its not like he has broke in. Anyone could stand there. The biggest crime here is the dickhead didnt think to go in his normal clothes and went in Southampton gear by the sounds of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: balkan tiger
I have just seen a video of a Sky Sports reporter stood in the exact same location it is alleged the spy was stood. It is literally a road leading to a golf club. I dont see how this is going to be anything more than a ticking off a fine for unsporting behaviour. Its not like he has broke in. Anyone could stand there. The biggest crime here is the dickhead didnt think to go in his normal clothes and went in Southampton gear by the sounds of it.
It doesn't matter where the offence happened. Nowhere in the rules does it specify that they have to have been trespassing or on the other club's property. This won't just be a fine.
 
It doesn't matter where the offence happened. Nowhere in the rules does it specify that they have to have been trespassing or on the other club's property. This won't just be a fine.
That whole area is private property with access to members of the public
All owned by steve gibson
The golf club/hotel etc
 
I think if OLM's Boro leak of a Thursday decision is correct, then that gives us plenty of time to prepare. I doubt many of the players have got over their hangovers after Monday night's celebrations yet.

£200m game and it’s fine margins at this level. When that amount of money is involved, he’d be stupid not to try every trick
 
  • Like
Reactions: will
Points deduction would be fairest and easiest to implement.
Large enough and I think Southampton would be asking to forfeit the result.
Certain relegation would affect the recruitment and retention of players. May as well hold their hands up and try again next year with no handicap.

Mia culpa and at least protect their good name .....a bit.
 
Surely they have to come down hard and make an example of Souithampton otherwise whats the point of the rule? We're only talking about the most financially valuable game in football at stake here; their cheating needs to have real consequence, which means they surely must get booted out of the play offs, otherwise cheating and breaking this rule is shown to pay (compared to the prize at stake).
 
I’ve seen a few saying Boro are blowing it out of proportion but I disagree. When Leeds did it, they got a fine because there was no official rule about this specific thing. Since then, the EFL introduced a rule to stamp it out. Southampton have blatantly disregarded and broken this rule. A fine isn’t sufficient. If they get a fine like Leeds, there was zero reason for the EFL to introduce a specific rule. It also sets a precedent for other teams to do it and just take the fine.

Boro and Gibson have every right to kick up a fuss.
 
Points deduction would be fairest and easiest to implement.
Large enough and I think Southampton would be asking to forfeit the result.
Certain relegation would affect the recruitment and retention of players. May as well hold their hands up and try again next year with no handicap.

Mia culpa and at least protect their good name .....a bit.
Not really unless it was imposed this season, and it won't be. Boro were wronged in what was a two-horse race to get to the final. Other teams may also have been spied on, which aggravates the issue and means perhaps they need to hold another hearing, but they have to deal with Southampton's transgression in a way which punishes them now and provides some redress for the wronged party. A forfeit 3-0 victory for Boro in the first leg solves the pressing problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gone For A Walk