Liverpool statement on Suarez

Scouse statement:

Liverpool Football Club is very surprised and disappointed with the decision of the Football Association Commission to find Luis Suarez guilty of the charges against him.

We look forward to the publication of the Commission's Judgment. We will study the detailed reasons of the Commission once they become available, but reserve our right to appeal or take any other course of action we feel appropriate with regards to this situation.

We find it extraordinary that Luis can be found guilty on the word of Patrice Evra alone when no-one else on the field of play - including Evra's own Manchester United teammates and all the match officials - heard the alleged conversation between the two players in a crowded Kop goalmouth while a corner kick was about to be taken.

The Club takes extremely seriously the fight against all forms of discrimination and has a long and successful track record in work relating to anti-racist activity and social inclusion. We remain committed to this ideal and equality for all, irrespective of a person's background.

LFC considers racism in any form to be unacceptable - without compromise. It is our strong held belief, having gone over the facts of the case, that Luis Suarez did not commit any racist act. It is also our opinion that the accusation by this particular player was not credible - certainly no more credible than his prior unfounded accusations.

It is key to note that Patrice Evra himself in his written statement in this case said 'I don't think that Luis Suarez is racist'. The FA in their opening remarks accepted that Luis Suarez was not racist.

Luis himself is of a mixed race family background as his grandfather was black. He has been personally involved since the 2010 World Cup in a charitable project which uses sport to encourage solidarity amongst people of different backgrounds with the central theme that the colour of a person's skin does not matter; they can all play together as a team.

He has played with black players and mixed with their families whilst with the Uruguay national side and was Captain at Ajax Amsterdam of a team with a proud multi-cultural profile, many of whom became good friends.

It seems incredible to us that a player of mixed heritage should be accused and found guilty in the way he has based on the evidence presented. We do not recognise the way in which Luis Suarez has been characterised.

It appears to us that the FA were determined to bring charges against Luis Suarez, even before interviewing him at the beginning of November. Nothing we have heard in the course of the hearing has changed our view that Luis Suarez is innocent of the charges brought against him and we will provide Luis with whatever support he now needs to clear his name.

We would also like to know when the FA intend to charge Patrice Evra with making abusive remarks to an opponent after he admitted himself in his evidence to insulting Luis Suarez in Spanish in the most objectionable of terms. Luis, to his credit, actually told the FA he had not heard the insult.

I find it astonishing that they have seemed to have forgotten or have chosen to ignore the fact that Luis Suarez admitted to using the word/term of "Negro" or "Negrito" towards Patrice Evra.

You can defend Luis Suarez's heritage along with his own family members being of black and mixed race all you want; but you can not possibly defend the use of this word/term on the shores of the UK in the 21st century on the professional football pitch.

They can appeal all they want. However the right thing to do is to accept the charges and admit a wrong has been committed. Shame on them. A great club has been brought down a notch by totally mis-guided 'player loyalty'.

 

Why not just post this on the Suarez thread you've been commenting on?!

 

Merge!

 

Attention whore (him, not you, well maybe you, I don't know about you, but mostly him).

 

this

I say Griff him

 

coz the statement deserves a thread of its own. its shocking. well i think so

 

please log in to view this image

 

It doesn't deserve a thread of its own.

 

please log in to view this image

 

That statement alone is far worse than the one you have posted. Liverpool a great club

 

Omg! Who in the world is that!?

 

Louis Nicollin, the owner of Montpellier.

 

Didn't know you were queen of threadland and all threads had to be approved by her majesty.

 

please log in to view this image

 

That Liverpool FC statement in full: "Luis Suárez can't be racist cos he's sorta black 'imself, in he?"

 

It looks like John Prescott in tramp mode

 

He owns something?

 

And it isn't a brightly painted caravan?!

 

Pretty much what I made of the statement.

 

As I understand it, the gist of Suarez's position is that "Negro" and "Negrito" aren't insults in Spanis, or at least Uruguayan Spanish.

I'm not sufficiently fluent to judge, but I do know that it is vary common for spanis speakers to use adjectives as nicknames: Rubio, Flaco, Gordo, Pecado, etc. Calling a player Negro/ito (Black or Blackie) is, they say, no more an insult than calling him Bajito (Shorty).

One of their most famous players is known as El Negro Jefe (the black governor/boss), which would indicate that at least in that case the term Negro is simply an adjective and not an insult. Simply translating words and assuming they have the same connotations can be tricky