The jury wouldn't convict for assault on the male officer, as he's the one that kicked them in the head, I doubt a retrial will change that.
How can you possibly know the reasons why they couldn't reach a verdict...He never kicked 'them' in the head,he kicked the skinny **** in the head,prior to that both he and the elder brother had assaulted the policeman.. I'm fairly sure the CPS have got a better insight into this than you or I will ever have but don't let that stop you making ridiculous assumptions.
Did the “ assault “ not take place before the cop put the kick in. A fresh thinking jury may think differently.
Could both sides be guilty? Just because the copper kicked the bloke does not mean he cannot have been assaulted by the bloke earlier.
Shove it. Money's tight times are hard I didn't fecking get you a card. The views expressed in my posts are not necessarily mine.
Well now you've both established you're a pair of ****s are you gonna give us a rest and find a room?
It was just my opinion, but as it’s already happened in the first case, it’s clearly not ridiculous. Not sure there’s any need for the ****ty attitude.
Fighttttt….linnet car park…what odds are we predicting? My money is on Rik…Glasgow kiss..goodnight lol
I’m not getting involved, it’s Friendship Day and we should all be kind to each other. (Set of ****s)