Transfer Rumours The Great Summer Splurge Transfer Window

This would depend upon the accuracy of use of the phrase(s) by those using them.

An agreement can equal a contract. But if people are not adhering strictly to what a word actually means (which is very common) then they may in reality be describing something technically different.

A pact I would say is something different to an ‘agreement’ and/or a ‘contract’ but again if being incorrectly used the person using the word may mean it to be a contract or agreement.

Wissa. If there is an agreement or contract agreed to sell him at a particular price in this window then that would be enforceable by him. Obviously, subject to small “print” etc but in general terms Brentford in failing to adhere to any agreed terms would be in breach of contract. As CC alluded to there might be a dispute as to what each party says was agreed. That’s why written contracts/agreements are so much better to have.

Isak. Agreement to renegotiate contract. This is so much woolier as all that’s being promised is to renegotiate and does not have any specific terms necessarily. Accordingly, if there have been ‘discussions’ then that commitment will have been met. Also, my recollection is there is reported to have been a discussion but because of other factors it would be revisited at a later date.

A contract/agreement needs to have terms that are ‘certain’ to be enforceable. If there are no or insufficient ‘certain’ terms then any contract/agreement could be unenforceable.

Edit: legal disclaimer. please bear in mind the above has been typed following consumption over a period of 2 hours of a bottle of wine.

 

He can’t.

 

So let's say 2 verbal conversations played out something like this...

Wissa: "If a Champions League club come in for me then I'd like to be able to speak with them"

Brentford: "Sure, so long as they offer more than £25m"

Wissa: "OK deal"



Isak: "I'd like to discuss improving my contract terms"

NUFC: "Sure, if we win a cup or qualify for champions league then we'll discuss new terms at the end of the season."

Isak: "OK deal"

 

More and more people are realising

 

There's a huge difference between what a recruitment set up is/looks like and who/what the recruited are.

It's nonsense to you because you're not understanding the difference and not because there's no separation between the two.

Mitchell is being proven right at this moment in time and more and more people are taking that angle, but it doesn't mean that outlook can't change.

Time is running out though surely? And would Paul Mitchell know what recruitment should look like?.. These are the questions people should be asking themselves.

 

No Newcastle rumours on BBC today thank God,this fella was mentioned recently

Manchester United and Manchester City are both interested in ParisSt-Germain's 26-year-old Italy goalkeeper Gianluigi Donnarumma, with the Ligue 1 side lining up Lille's French goalkeeper Lucas Chevalier, 23, as a potential replacement. (L'Equipe - in French)