If we accepted £100mil from liverpool for isak then they'd have to included connor bradley and james mcconell. But even then i'd be inclined to say no.
I don't get the upset about players being linked with other clubs. Means we're doing well and we've got awesome players.
Indeed. I was just mocking the journos who get paid to come up with garbage stories to help sell their **** publications, or to raise their own profile.
Can't see anything other than a substantial record for an EPL player - Coutinho was about £142m with add on's going to Barcelona. Genuinely can't see him going for anything less than £150m GUARENTEED fee's and then probably add on on top of that taking it closer to £200m based on goals scored and winning the league and CL. When donkeys like Rice, Fernandez and Caicedo are going for £100+m there's no question Isak is 3/4 league above all those players.
Everyone has a price. Isak continues and he’s a 150m player to 200m as he’s a striker. Hes prime age. If Isak said he wanted to go to Liverpool then we wouldn’t be in a position to stop him really. Either way we either keep a brilliant player or we bag 150m plus and that opens the doors for significant spending.
Not if you don't want to sell and Isak hasn't said anything of the sort. It's a nonsense story. Nobody is going to pay over 150 million anyway because they cannot afford it. Newcastle are going to push on with Isak and if that doesn't work out things might change.
Yes we do. All we have to do is grow a pair and say no. There's 3 years left on his contract so we control what happens and not anyone else Including Isak.
Something tells me we've had a few sponsorships refused and left unsponsored for years. I think we'll be ok with Isak now.
£150m gets everyone round the table. £200m for any EPL club, possibly £175m for a team elsewhere in Europe. That ought to do it. If we came out with that we’d sharp see who wants to stop swinging their dicks around and put it back in their pants!
