Why use language like that?
I like coming on here after a game for a while (unless we've lost, of course). Some things annoy me, but then I'm sure I'm annoying to others in return.
Thought he seemed card happy at the beginning, there were three yellows in the first 20 minutes or so, then he suddenly went the other way and just let everything go.
The ideal scenario for me is crowd noise/no comms. I think Prime do that, can't remember, I've only managed to use it once and it was great for taking in the atmosphere without the inane chatter.
I thought the same thing exactly.Couldn't agree more! They apologised for the troubles they were having, I left I said they should be apologising for fixing them
If love a red button option to remove commentary. I won't mute the TV because I want to hear the crowd. I loved it in the pandemic too when we could hear the players.
As for coming in here after a game, I think it's the worst time to visit now. Doesn't matter if we win, lose play well, etc, there will be plenty of moaning and fault picking on here. You've all heard me say it for years; some posters on here would still mean if we win 10-0! (They're entitled to do that too)
Sometimes a commentary is useful if you can't make out - or don't know - who some players are, or if an incident is unclear and they have some info that we don't.
In contrast, listening to a match on the radio can be really exciting. They concentrate on the action and seem more aware that those listening want the details and the enthusiasm without the daft banter.
Yes, that's what I was thinking when I wrote it. A more descriptive type of commentary rather than an opinion-riddled narrative. At the beginnings of games they often prattle on for 4 or 5 minutes with unnecessary background information or a little personal banter and hardly refer to the action unless something major happens.
