APT rules
- Thread starter Fox Mulder
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Yeah... looks suspiciously like city have told the Premier League they're going to tell the world all the full findings.
The full findings can't come soon enough because now both the PL and the red cartel arse lickers claiming victory are going to be stomped into the ground.
I have absolutely no doubt city are telling the truth because of how aggressive they've been... Masters and co are trying to hide in their cocoon of lies and City are going to consume them.
Masters is like Hitler hiding in his bunker knowing he's done.
They are going to lose.
Radcliffe is a particularly aggressive parasite and they'll all come out from beneath Masters trousers when threatened.
Surely not
and there's me thinking Manchester as a metropolis
you're a ****, it's going to take 30 minutes of digging out kitchen roll, mops, wet wipes for laptop, to clean this up or i get into bother later when er indoors comes home.
Man City and the PL have asked the tribunal to clarify whether their ruling means that all of the APT rules are unlawful.
If yes then it's game over. Any club can engage in APT's without anyone limiting the value.
If yes then it's game over. Any club can engage in APT's without anyone limiting the value.
In Cliffs letter he mentioned sending another letter to the PL. I doubt the Premier League is keen for the full judgement and I suspect that was City saying we're asking for clarity because you're playing dumb.
They want the full judgement made public.
It is fairly damning. Despite what some journalists claim.
Why don't they just release the full judgement in the first place ? Is it because one set of worms succeeded in only having to share certain parts or something?
My take on this is that man city must have something because if there was nothing why would they publicly shout knowing full judgement would make them look dishonest if they had nothing?
They've basically called the PL Liars and asked for full transparency.. that's not the words of a guilty party making false claims.
Didn’t we do the same thing? Threaten exposure and they meekly shut up? I suspect the same thing. I must admit I didn’t think it was AS big, but City - who are far bigger than the PL - are clearly not ****ing about.
I go back to the point that if mega rich companies and/or states want to pour money in but it doesn’t leave the club exposed then it does NO HARM. Clubs get bigger, talent comes in, PL gets richer, EFL gets richer. The protection of a select few has become incredibly detrimental to so many people.
I go back to the point that if mega rich companies and/or states want to pour money in but it doesn’t leave the club exposed then it does NO HARM. Clubs get bigger, talent comes in, PL gets richer, EFL gets richer. The protection of a select few has become incredibly detrimental to so many people.
The Premier Leagues entire attempt was to keep the CAT case private. I watched the hearing and can assure you they requested nothing else.
The Premier League has two tactics 1. Delay. 2. Hide.
Oh sorry 3 Lie
You forgot number 4. Send in a clown to perform cluelessly whilst in court. That CAT stream was ****ing hysterically funny just because that PL lawyer was such a ****ing clown.
Why is the PL the only European top flight not regulated or controlled by its country’s football association?
Never really got that.
Never really got that.