Match Day Thread Hammers away next

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Too much is read into 'players not enjoying the football' that's purely fan fiction, if they're winning they don't give a **** what style it is, you just have to look at how many great players were happy playing for Bourinho, and how many begged to join him compared with those who wanted to leave. Their main concern is playing in the first XI, then playing well, then winning.
There's a time to play out the back, and there's a time to just get rid, when you're 3 v 4 you just get rid.

The last few seasons at Town and the contrast with the short term win at any cost mentality of managers like Mick McCarthy that saw us drop to League One prove otherwise.
 
I think the thing which is most concerning after a generally positive start is that we've gone backwards in elements of our game. Is this because the players we've brought in aren't as good or is it because we've got a team full of new players....either is slightly concerning and maybe we've tried to integrate too many too soon.

I feel it’s a bit of that and just the massive step up in quality we’re playing week in, week out. League One and the Championship are much more forgiving leagues than the Premier League, as we’re finding out. The signs of positivity is that we’ve played three teams in last season’s top four and only three home games so far this season. I think it’s our home form that will decide if we go down or stay up.

If we do manage to stay up, the hope is we don’t then need another massive recruitment drive to upgrade players we’ve brought in who have struggled. Players like Johnson, Szmodics, and Ogbene look like they’re struggling and unable to put down serious claims for starting games.
 
I feel it’s a bit of that and just the massive step up in quality we’re playing week in, week out. League One and the Championship are much more forgiving leagues than the Premier League, as we’re finding out. The signs of positivity is that we’ve played three teams in last season’s top four and only three home games so far this season. I think it’s our home form that will decide if we go down or stay up.

If we do manage to stay up, the hope is we don’t then need another massive recruitment drive to upgrade players we’ve brought in who have struggled. Players like Johnson, Szmodics, and Ogbene look like they’re struggling and unable to put down serious claims for starting games.

The other problem is game time for our newbies. Poor Szmodics, who started well early season, and proved a handful, has only come on when the game is almost lost, and is expected to turn things around.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Evesham and Nuggets
The other problem is game time for our newbies. Poor Szmodics, who started well early season, and proved a handful, has only come on when the game is almost lost, and is expected to turn things around.

Yeah, get the impression McKenna doesn’t yet know what attacking line up to trust other than Delap up top. I think Spanish and a couple of others want to see an attacking midfield trio of Clarke on the left, Hutchinson down the right, and Szmodics through the middle. I’d like to see that over the next few matches.
 
Anyone else think McKenna should change the system and formation for away games - or is that likely to further disrupt new players settling in and change a previously successful style?

I do feel we need to be more defensively solid. A back three of Greaves, O’Shea and Woolfenden behind Davis at left wing back and maybe Burns at right wing back should be more solid. It’ll also allow Davis to focus more on attacking - which is his strength - rather than defending.

A midfield duo of Morsy and Phillips behind an attacking trio of Hutchinson, Szmodics, and Delap (pace on the break) could work. If we’re chasing games and opt to go long, could always switch to a - can’t believe I’m saying it - two up top with Hirst and Delap, with one central attacking midfielder behind.

Fortunately still early days, but we’ve only managed two points out of a possible 12 away from home, including trips to Southampton and West Ham. We played three at the back throughout most of pre-season and although they were friendlies, kept consecutive clean sheets against strong opposition.
 
Anyone else think McKenna should change the system and formation for away games - or is that likely to further disrupt new players settling in and change a previously successful style?

I do feel we need to be more defensively solid. A back three of Greaves, O’Shea and Woolfenden behind Davis at left wing back and maybe Burns at right wing back should be more solid. It’ll also allow Davis to focus more on attacking - which is his strength - rather than defending.

A midfield duo of Morsy and Phillips behind an attacking trio of Hutchinson, Szmodics, and Delap (pace on the break) could work. If we’re chasing games and opt to go long, could always switch to a - can’t believe I’m saying it - two up top with Hirst and Delap, with one central attacking midfielder behind.

Fortunately still early days, but we’ve only managed two points out of a possible 12 away from home, including trips to Southampton and West Ham. We played three at the back throughout most of pre-season and although they were friendlies, kept consecutive clean sheets against strong opposition.

Lots of sensible ideas there Nuggets.

Or he could go with the regular Championship team, those who are left!
 
Lots of sensible ideas there Nuggets.

Or he could go with the regular Championship team, those who are left!

Tuanzebe and Morsy have certainly made the step up. Could be an argument to give Woolfenden, Burgess, Luongo, Chaplin, Burns, and Hirst some more opportunities. From what I’ve seen from them so far this season - which in some cases is relatively little game time - I’m not sure any of them are making overly strong cases.

McKenna spent several years managing the Manchester United first team in the Premier League, so he knows the standard. Maybe he’s expecting too much from last year’s group of players? He has trained most of those aforementioned Ipswich players for almost three years now. I do think it’s a case that he knows or strongly suspects those players aren’t ready/quite cut out for regular first time Premier League football.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Evesham
It wasn't an instant fix when KMc first came in and I remember a few questioned whether he was up to the task of building a winning side from a mostly new squad.We're almost back to that stage again with well over half the side for most games this Season having joined in the Summer.
We just need patience and remember the good performances have shown enough to give us hope of surviving this Season and then pushing on.
 
Think wolfenden can consider himself unlucky not to be playing. For me, he was MOM against Fulham but then has been dropped. Still early days with the team needing to gel but for me, the balance is not right yet. Neither Ogbene or Burns have been impressive down the right and Hutchinson hasn’t looked great in the 10. Think szmodics definitely deserves a game there. Other main concern in the keeper - not sure what to make of him which is a problem as that is 1 area where consistency is very important
 
When we went up with Bielsa we thought we’d struck gold, we did well season one finishing mid table but it was behind closed doors due to Covid. Bielsa had turned average championship players into a good squad, but then we came unstuck as the signings continued to arrive.

If we signed a player they’d not be Bielsa ready for 8 weeks minimum, we’d not see them play and we all used to get as frustrated as hell. Money has destroyed the PL and it takes a season or two making up the numbers before it really sinks in.

It’s a three tier league, few break in or drop out the top 8

I noticed one of your guys saying you’re ahead of schedule, you possibly are as you really need young talent ready to make the step up. It’s so hard spending £100m wisely and when you spread that over 10 players (or region of) it’s a gamble.

As an outsider looking in, your transfer activity screamed one of two things, scatter gun approach or your coach considered the majority of your players were not good enough. Maybe he under estimated those that got you there, individually lacking, but as a team lots of small cogs that turned the big wheel.

When I’m on here having a wind-up, it’s only to have a dig at Spanish who enjoys his visits to the Leeds forum. I do see so many similarities of when we went up after a long absence and thinking we’ll be okay we have Bielsa.

To be successful in the PL after a long absence you need a bottomless pit of money and a way of fooling fair play. The reason teams like Man City go for Pep and why Jose was around for so long has nothing to do with their coaching skills, it’s because they handle the egos well. Players valued in excess of £50m all have one. It’s the coaching staff that work with the players who are responsible for improving them and why teams invest massively at youth level

Look at how many coaches for City, Chelsea, Man U and the others go on well to succeed in the championship.

If you are signing a player in England aged 24 or older for around £15m, then I guarantee that they’ve been looked over and scouted extensively by even the likes of Brighton. They’ve been considered not good enough, look at Spurs buying Gray from us £40m and Rutter to Brighton £40m it’s crazy

Sounds like a similar situation, under Bielsa as it is here under McKenna. I would say McKenna appears to be a bit more of a pragmatist, as we've become more and more direct in his time here. Part of that is also figuring out how to get the best out of individuals and how that fits in with the rest of the team. But that understanding is there at the moment which was there with last years team. So of that might be tactical some of it just because we have different players.

In terms of recruitment we maybe didn't need to recruit on quite the scale we did but particularly in full back, midfield and forward positions we didn't have the strength in depth and many of our backup players last season would either be nowhere near good enough for this level or left, so we needed a decent level of recruitment. I'm just surprised at how quickly McKenna has dropped players who did nothing wrong i.e. Walton, Woolfenden, Burgess, Luongo and Chaplin. Whilst I suspected the new players would eventually replace our team from last season I thought it would've been a more gradual process.
 
Anyone else think McKenna should change the system and formation for away games - or is that likely to further disrupt new players settling in and change a previously successful style?

I do feel we need to be more defensively solid. A back three of Greaves, O’Shea and Woolfenden behind Davis at left wing back and maybe Burns at right wing back should be more solid. It’ll also allow Davis to focus more on attacking - which is his strength - rather than defending.

A midfield duo of Morsy and Phillips behind an attacking trio of Hutchinson, Szmodics, and Delap (pace on the break) could work. If we’re chasing games and opt to go long, could always switch to a - can’t believe I’m saying it - two up top with Hirst and Delap, with one central attacking midfielder behind.

Fortunately still early days, but we’ve only managed two points out of a possible 12 away from home, including trips to Southampton and West Ham. We played three at the back throughout most of pre-season and although they were friendlies, kept consecutive clean sheets against strong opposition.

I don’t think that’s the answer. We need to fix the problem. Muric hit some unbelievable passes in the first half but inexplicably his nerves go to **** at times. The players are capable. And we won’t survive if we have a ‘win at home, scrape points away’ mentality. We are in a mini league of half a dozen sides and the only way we’ll finish in the top half of that is to pick up wins. The occasional draw away from home won’t be enough.
 
It wasn't a good game for us.

First 10/15 minutes our press was really good and we caused problems but after that it just went downhill. Clarke played too narrow, Burns wouldn't take his man on and Hutch ran into dead ends again. Phillips struggled today, Morsy was good though, taking the ball, shielding it and driving or passing on.

Leif is getting found out in defence, I have no idea why he went with the runner instead of sticking to the player with the ball for the first goal. Greaves did some good stuff but also some not so good things. I thought O'Shea had a good game overall. We missed Axel today, I'm pretty sure Kudus would've been nullified a lot more had he played. Muric is a great shot stopper, I dislike how he doesn't look for the quick throw out though, just holds onto the ball as if he wants to give us a breather or something. Wish he'd get the ball moving faster.

Delap can't last 90 minutes, at the moment he's a 60 minute player. Our success over the last couple of seasons has come from telling the front four to run their socks off for 60 and then get subbed. It's how our press continues to work for a whole match. For some reason, McK is waiting to make subs now and it's costing us badly because we end up playing for about 20 minutes (between 60 and 80) with no energy, no press and under the cosh.

I thought Chaplin showed some good signs, finding pockets of space and playing decent balls forward. Taylor got stuck in but with the subs coming so late in the match, they have little time to really make an impact.

Like ptc says, we're lacking fluidity at the moment. We do have a lot of new players integrating into the team, and I want to have faith that it will come good, but you can't waste too many games while you work towards that goal. The PL season is 38 games, not the 46 we've been used to. That doesn't leave much room for mistakes, or learning time, you need to be getting it right sooner rather than later. It may mean bringing the likes of Chaplin back in. Delap should start, he's been playing well, but Hirst, Chaplin and Taylor should be getting at least 30 minutes every match.

We weren't aggressive enough in attack, no strong running in behind or driving with the ball committing players, and we slowed it down too often. The speed of passing needs to be quicker, the runs need to be sooner and the passes need to be on point. Lots of lessons to be learned from this one. We've got two weeks to work on improvement.

That's the worst I've seen Clarke, who on the whole I've been impressed with and is the players I do think looks a major upgrade on that side...although I do think Broadhead is a classy player who could still have a role to play for us either on that left hand side or centrally.

I've generally been impressed with Burns at this level but do not think we're using him well enough, he's making runs and not being found and also there isn't quite the same movement for him to have space (from the other forwards and our RB) He's still taking up good positions though and generally doing enough to pin the opposition LB back. I haven't seen really anything from Ogbene yet that makes me think he should be getting in on the right but maybe that is for the same

Greaves has generally impressed but reminds me a little of Delaney who we had many years ago who often gets so tight to his marker he gets pulled out of the back line easily which leaves gaps and sometimes makes others look like they've made a mistake. Burgess is as slow as they come but positionally the past couple of years he's been outstanding so much so no one has noticed how slow he is.

Agree with you in regards to O'Shea generally thought he had a decent game, who's clearly quicker and stronger than Woolfenden, also pretty good on the longer balls. But Woolfenden was outstanding against Fulham and we haven't seen him since and I do think we miss him on the ball drawing the press. The partnership he has with Morsy is so important to breaking the press and also important to support Morsy start to dominate the midfield as we saw against Fulham in the second half. Without him and Hladky in the team we're struggling to beat the press and tend to bypass Morsy more often or when we do as we say with Murics pass yesterday do so completely inappropriately. People are saying we're passing it out far too much at the back, I'd disagree, we're actually going far more direct than we have been sometimes to good effect but we don't seem to be trying to beat the press by short passing and movement anywhere near as much. Under both Walton and Hladky we rarely kicked it long at all, we had set patterns of play. What Muric is doing not inviting the press and just making bad decisions, in my mind it's nothing to do with passing it out too much at the back.
 
I don’t think that’s the answer. We need to fix the problem. Muric hit some unbelievable passes in the first half but inexplicably his nerves go to **** at times. The players are capable. And we won’t survive if we have a ‘win at home, scrape points away’ mentality. We are in a mini league of half a dozen sides and the only way we’ll finish in the top half of that is to pick up wins. The occasional draw away from home won’t be enough.

Fair enough. I do think one of key strengths last season was how our playing style was so flexible and unpredictable. We were equally comfortable playing out from the back and also launching accurate direct balls into the channels. Burgess, in particular, was great at those long diagonal balls upfield. Sadly, he’s not been able to showcase that ability at this level.

In the Premier League, we’re playing much faster, tactically aware defences. Burns is a case in point. In the Championship and League One, he had the space to take his man on, knock the ball past him, and usually beat him for pace. Against Liverpool and West Ham, when he started the match, he’s been unable to do that because the opposition’s left back is much faster making the recovering run and the left sided centre back was quicker getting over the cover. So when Burns get past his man, he’s usually out wide with two defenders crowding him out. If we played somebody like Hutchinson out on the right, he has the skill to potentially cut inside or pick out a pass (he should be encouraged to pass more often, this season he gives off the impression he has to do everything himself, which is costing him).

The goals we’ve scored so far this season seem to have either been through some great build up play or knock downs from set pieces. Playing out from the back is fine if you can do it well. I agree in Muric we have what looks to be a strong shot stopper, but is a bit erratic when it comes to distribution. Some of the short balls he played out yesterday were to guys that had West Ham attackers pressing up high. I don’t think we’re quite there in being able to reliably play through the Premier League press.
 
Fair enough. I do think one of key strengths last season was how our playing style was so flexible and unpredictable. We were equally comfortable playing out from the back and also launching accurate direct balls into the channels. Burgess, in particular, was great at those long diagonal balls upfield. Sadly, he’s not been able to showcase that ability at this level.

In the Premier League, we’re playing much faster, tactically aware defences. Burns is a case in point. In the Championship and League One, he had the space to take his man on, knock the ball past him, and usually beat him for pace. Against Liverpool and West Ham, when he started the match, he’s been unable to do that because the opposition’s left back is much faster making the recovering run and the left sided centre back was quicker getting over the cover. So when Burns get past his man, he’s usually out wide with two defenders crowding him out. If we played somebody like Hutchinson out on the right, he has the skill to potentially cut inside or pick out a pass (he should be encouraged to pass more often, this season he gives off the impression he has to do everything himself, which is costing him).

The goals we’ve scored so far this season seem to have either been through some great build up play or knock downs from set pieces. Playing out from the back is fine if you can do it well. I agree in Muric we have what looks to be a strong shot stopper, but is a bit erratic when it comes to distribution. Some of the short balls he played out yesterday were to guys that had West Ham attackers pressing up high. I don’t think we’re quite there in being able to reliably play through the Premier League press.

If we want an element of unpredictability, and I agree that we do, all we need to do is rotate the three players behind Delap - and arguably the midfield position next to Morsy too. None of Jack Clarke, Hutchinson, Burns have earned the right to start. Hutch in particular I think would benefit from a bit less responsibility too.
 
Honestly, I think if we stay up it will be because we **** about with the ball in our own area, keep our heads and keep working hard. We just need to be a lot sharper. I expected us to have a better second half of the season than first and I still think that will be the case - provided we don’t have a big gap open up to seventh / eighth bottom before Christmas.

McKenna has a problem now that you can’t solve with logic. The players aren’t enjoying their football, the fans don’t love the players and every side we play will fancy their chances. The only way to solve that is to double down on playing expressive football and give homegrown players and last seasons’ crowd pleasers - Woolfy, Luongo, Harry Clarke, Chaplin, Hirst as well as Szmodics and Ogbene who can get the crowd up - more game time and have some fun with it, which was very much lacking yesterday.

I agree in regards to passing it out the back. We've been superb at breaking the press by passing it around at the back the past couple of seasons...that came with a risk but we were very good at it. Since Muric and O'Shea have come in we're not trying it anywhere near as much. The mistakes Muric has made have just been awful decisions...he's clearly looks like an upgrade on both Walton and Hladky in terms of shot stopping but sounding old fashioned is he one of these players who has superb stats because of that but that masks some of his faults, for me Walton is a superbly rounded sweeper keeper who takes a lot of pressure of his defence and his distribution is actually decent, in many ways he reminds me of Richard Wright in both how he comes off his line and distribution. As someone who played in defence he'd be the keeper who'd make me feel most relaxed. Hladky was a half decent keeper who was just outstanding with his feet, he got caught a couple of times but on the whole his decision making in that regard was superb. Murics clearly got a lot of raw potential but consistency just isn't there at the moment.
 
Yeah, get the impression McKenna doesn’t yet know what attacking line up to trust other than Delap up top. I think Spanish and a couple of others want to see an attacking midfield trio of Clarke on the left, Hutchinson down the right, and Szmodics through the middle. I’d like to see that over the next few matches.

I think it'd be interesting to see that but I also worry about bit with the balance and width. You would have the 2 wide players want to come inside alot which could over crowd the center and would require the full backs to overlap and we don't have that especially on the right atm. You will also have 4 players who like to dribble and even when they're effective lose the ball quite regularly. We certainly need to look at getting the balance right. You could see the spaces opening up at bit more yesterday when Hirst and Chaplin because they know where the spaces are and Davis also knew the runs they'd make.
 
Tuanzebe and Morsy have certainly made the step up. Could be an argument to give Woolfenden, Burgess, Luongo, Chaplin, Burns, and Hirst some more opportunities. From what I’ve seen from them so far this season - which in some cases is relatively little game time - I’m not sure any of them are making overly strong cases.

McKenna spent several years managing the Manchester United first team in the Premier League, so he knows the standard. Maybe he’s expecting too much from last year’s group of players? He has trained most of those aforementioned Ipswich players for almost three years now. I do think it’s a case that he knows or strongly suspects those players aren’t ready/quite cut out for regular first time Premier League football.

I do think Davis is starting to step up after a difficult start the openness down that side is the risk you take by having such an attacking LB. I also think Phillips hasn't covered that side as well as Luongo has previously. If Phillips was someone who I'd never seen play before (except for us) I'd be questioning why we've brought him in, people beat him far too easily, I still think he'll grow into the role and certainly hasn't looked as bad as he was with West Ham but Luongo had an outstanding first half vs Liverpool and we have not seen him since really.

I've also actually liked Burns in what I've seen, he could do better and has been quiet in games (players need to use him more) but for example in the Liverpool game I think he had the beating of Robertson, he generally made the wrong decision once he'd got the better of him, think the occasion got to him. But I think him going off was one of the factors which turned the tide for Liverpool because he'd managed to keep Robertson pinned back the majority of the game, he then started to move through the gears when Burns went off.

I'm not saying our players from last season will all make the step up but so far for me it's been the newbies making the majority of mistakes so far this season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Evesham
It wasn't an instant fix when KMc first came in and I remember a few questioned whether he was up to the task of building a winning side from a mostly new squad.We're almost back to that stage again with well over half the side for most games this Season having joined in the Summer.
We just need patience and remember the good performances have shown enough to give us hope of surviving this Season and then pushing on.

Agree it feels like that again, we evolved over the course of a season to pretty much a perfect team. The thing is then we had 19 new players and nothing to really build on...there was no choice. There is a choice this season about building on what we've been good at in the past
 
Anyone else think McKenna should change the system and formation for away games - or is that likely to further disrupt new players settling in and change a previously successful style?

I do feel we need to be more defensively solid. A back three of Greaves, O’Shea and Woolfenden behind Davis at left wing back and maybe Burns at right wing back should be more solid. It’ll also allow Davis to focus more on attacking - which is his strength - rather than defending.

A midfield duo of Morsy and Phillips behind an attacking trio of Hutchinson, Szmodics, and Delap (pace on the break) could work. If we’re chasing games and opt to go long, could always switch to a - can’t believe I’m saying it - two up top with Hirst and Delap, with one central attacking midfielder behind.

Fortunately still early days, but we’ve only managed two points out of a possible 12 away from home, including trips to Southampton and West Ham. We played three at the back throughout most of pre-season and although they were friendlies, kept consecutive clean sheets against strong opposition.

I like the idea partially about 5 at the back, we used to play it very well under the Burley era. How about with what you have said but with a forward line of Hirst, with Delap and Szmodics behind
 
Fair enough. I do think one of key strengths last season was how our playing style was so flexible and unpredictable. We were equally comfortable playing out from the back and also launching accurate direct balls into the channels. Burgess, in particular, was great at those long diagonal balls upfield. Sadly, he’s not been able to showcase that ability at this level.

In the Premier League, we’re playing much faster, tactically aware defences. Burns is a case in point. In the Championship and League One, he had the space to take his man on, knock the ball past him, and usually beat him for pace. Against Liverpool and West Ham, when he started the match, he’s been unable to do that because the opposition’s left back is much faster making the recovering run and the left sided centre back was quicker getting over the cover. So when Burns get past his man, he’s usually out wide with two defenders crowding him out. If we played somebody like Hutchinson out on the right, he has the skill to potentially cut inside or pick out a pass (he should be encouraged to pass more often, this season he gives off the impression he has to do everything himself, which is costing him).

The goals we’ve scored so far this season seem to have either been through some great build up play or knock downs from set pieces. Playing out from the back is fine if you can do it well. I agree in Muric we have what looks to be a strong shot stopper, but is a bit erratic when it comes to distribution. Some of the short balls he played out yesterday were to guys that had West Ham attackers pressing up high. I don’t think we’re quite there in being able to reliably play through the Premier League press.

We do miss those long diagonal passes which picked out Burns and Davis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Evesham