Off Topic Politics Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I strongly suspect that, as with most large-scale problems, it has many causes. Needs someone with some nous and some political weight to shake it by the neck but not break it in the process.

Also badly needs someone to take social care seriously.

Vin

Absolutely. And yes just sorting out social care itself would make a huge difference as there's thousands of people spend huge amounts of their lives in hospital without a medical need simply because they have nowhere else to go.

As I said yesterday though it needs a change in mindset from the public as nobody wants to pay for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChilcoSaint
Devils advocate, but is there actually any study that effectively proves the net effect of immigration on the NHS, accounting for both impact of increased population vs the direct effect of immigration on staffing?

Genuinely think that without immigration the NHS wouldn’t be functioning anymore, we just don’t put in the funding and/or effort to train enough Brits to sustain the system.

For example if you removed Filipinos from Southampton General I find it hard to believe that the nursing capacity wouldn’t just completely collapse, even if it only treated the British population of the city.

The entire Trust would collapse overnight of you removed migrant workers from it.
 
Surprised that no one has piked up in the news that it now very much looks like the SAS were involved in war crimes in Afghanistan and Iraq, one unit reported assoicated with theexecution of 54 civilians. Given the furore regarding the attrocities carried out by the Russians in Ukraine and also in light of the recent cpirt case in Australia, isn't it time that all actions in war be considered criminal ? I think the notion of "special forces" is an issue that the United Nations needs to consider given that in even "civilized" countries , such units appear to be operating outside the law.

Not really a huge surprise but good that it's being called out. Normally only the 'losers' of war are punished for their war crimes while the 'winners' get off scot free.

Not sure you could make any actions in war criminal. If your land is invaded do you stand around waiting for the UN to turn up rather than fight back? Non starter imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Schrodinger's Cat
One change I'd like to see that requires no reorganisations:

As I said yesterday though it needs a change in mindset from the public as nobody wants to pay for it.

I think it was Francis Wheen who said that the biggest fraud ever perpetrated on the British public was that you can have good public services and low taxes.

University friend of mine lives in Norway. He pays (or paid, this was several years ago) the thick end of 70% tax on his top earnings and said he didn't begrudge a penny of it because everything works.

Vin
 
One change I'd like to see that requires no reorganisations:



I think it was Francis Wheen who said that the biggest fraud ever perpetrated on the British public was that you can have good public services and low taxes.

University friend of mine lives in Norway. He pays (or paid, this was several years ago) the thick end of 70% tax on his top earnings and said he didn't begrudge a penny of it because everything works.

Vin

Yep I’d likely be ok with going along with that, if stuff works. Trouble is, what price to fix it all in the first place.
 
One change I'd like to see that requires no reorganisations:



I think it was Francis Wheen who said that the biggest fraud ever perpetrated on the British public was that you can have good public services and low taxes.

University friend of mine lives in Norway. He pays (or paid, this was several years ago) the thick end of 70% tax on his top earnings and said he didn't begrudge a penny of it because everything works.

Vin

Yep agree 100%. I'd much rather pay more in tax and have proper services which can be relied upon, than pay what I do now but have to wait over 8 months to see a mental health specialist.
 
Well, at least we can all agree on this topic. It’s really bad guys.

Chronic staffing shortages combined with overcrowding & aging population. As I’ve said - I personally don’t think the NHS can survive much longer.

The worst part is that the politicians are basically ignoring what’s happening. It’s a ****ing disgrace.

I don’t really care how it gets resolved but something massive needs to happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Billy Bates
One change I'd like to see that requires no reorganisations:



I think it was Francis Wheen who said that the biggest fraud ever perpetrated on the British public was that you can have good public services and low taxes.

University friend of mine lives in Norway. He pays (or paid, this was several years ago) the thick end of 70% tax on his top earnings and said he didn't begrudge a penny of it because everything works.

Vin
There we have it
Pay more taxes to enable govt to fund better public services

… and use your vote to support for a govt that delivers improvements or against one that doesn’t

Still many challenges but it’s a dream
 
One change I'd like to see that requires no reorganisations:



I think it was Francis Wheen who said that the biggest fraud ever perpetrated on the British public was that you can have good public services and low taxes.

University friend of mine lives in Norway. He pays (or paid, this was several years ago) the thick end of 70% tax on his top earnings and said he didn't begrudge a penny of it because everything works.

Vin
There we have it
Pay more taxes to enable govt to fund better public services

… and use your vote to support for a govt that delivers improvements or against one that doesn’t

Still many challenges but it’s a dream
Billy's got some good ideas.
You must log in or register to see media
 
Not really a huge surprise but good that it's being called out. Normally only the 'losers' of war are punished for their war crimes while the 'winners' get off scot free.

Not sure you could make any actions in war criminal. If your land is invaded do you stand around waiting for the UN to turn up rather than fight back? Non starter imo.

There isn't a conflict that hasn't featured war crimes on all sides, but it's important for it to be punished, not just to maintain some semblance of humanity, but because ultimately nothing prolongs conflicts (and makes the next conflict much more likely) like the commission of war crimes against the civilian population and prisoners of war. Soldiers that expect to receive no quarter or for civilians to be brutalized if they lose will necessarily fight harder, and nothing turns civilians into combatants quite like war crimes.

Countries that sweep their own actions under the rug aren't merely aiding and abetting that barbarity, they are galvanizing their opposition and undermining their own forces. Because the Afghani and Iraqi population knows damned well that these war crimes were committed, whether the UK (and the US, and Australia, and very likely Canada as well) admit to them or not.
 
Well, at least we can all agree on this topic. It’s really bad guys.

Chronic staffing shortages combined with overcrowding & aging population. As I’ve said - I personally don’t think the NHS can survive much longer.

The worst part is that the politicians are basically ignoring what’s happening. It’s a ****ing disgrace.

I don’t really care how it gets resolved but something massive needs to happen.
Let's be clear though, in the US millions of people have little or no health care provision, 27m in 2021
Familes often lose their healthcare when breadwinners lose their jobs
Per capita, healthcare costs the US twice as much as the UK

In its current parlous state the NHS is still better than that
 
Let's be clear though, in the US millions of people have little or no health care provision, 27m in 2021
Familes often lose their healthcare when breadwinners lose their jobs
Per capita, healthcare costs the US twice as much as the UK

In its current parlous state the NHS is still better than that

Yup. The US suffers because:

Doctor takes a cut of drugs prescribed
Hospital makes a profit
Insurer makes a profit
Ambulance companies make a profit
Claims assessors make a profit
Everyone involved makes a profit

Also means that if you're sent to a different company (for that is what they are, companies) from your last appointment they don't have your records so you spend time (for which they charge) explaining your history and having repeat tests (for which they charge) before they can deal with you.

Chap I know in the USA works in a Fortune 500 company and has what he describes as superb health insurance. His wife has been ill so he still paid $7,200 in copay (excess) last year..

And with all that they pay 15% instead of 7% of GDP on healthcare.

**** privatisation

Vin
 
Didn’t try terribly hard, did they..

You must log in or register to see images

My parents' rural community organized a town hall with the police and their local Member of the Legislative Assembly a couple weeks back. There's a theft ring in the area that has been performing break-and-enters to steal stuff for months now. Everyone knows who it is, including the police (who once escorted someone to the property to take something back that they'd left on their lawn, and did nothing else).

The police were downright dismissive of the whole thing...just as with your (unquestionably copy-and-pasted) response there, their attitude was that if the community provided incontrovertible evidence, they might take a look, but no promises. In the meantime, just live with the pack (seriously, there's more than a dozen of them on a small property) of meth-heads repeatedly skulking around people's houses and stealing stuff.

But they can sling traffic tickets like no one's business. Outside chance they'll get involved if and when someone gets hurt, but given that they've proven less than interested in investigating outright murders, I wouldn't count on it.
 
My parents' rural community organized a town hall with the police and their local Member of the Legislative Assembly a couple weeks back. There's a theft ring in the area that has been performing break-and-enters to steal stuff for months now. Everyone knows who it is, including the police (who once escorted someone to the property to take something back that they'd left on their lawn, and did nothing else).

The police were downright dismissive of the whole thing...just as with your (unquestionably copy-and-pasted) response there, their attitude was that if the community provided incontrovertible evidence, they might take a look, but no promises. In the meantime, just live with the pack (seriously, there's more than a dozen of them on a small property) of meth-heads repeatedly skulking around people's houses and stealing stuff.

But they can sling traffic tickets like no one's business. Outside chance they'll get involved if and when someone gets hurt, but given that they've proven less than interested in investigating outright murders, I wouldn't count on it.

I now have video footage that they couldn’t be arsed to find.