nearly all the clubs debt is to the owners who lent the club money for the Main stand build , redevelopment of the Anfield Road and the new Kirby facility so really isn't much of a worry unlike the H&G days .
It was very nice of the builders to accept our make believe money though .
I think you know exactly what the term spending money that doesn't exist means and to suggest it means make believe money is disingenuous.
Being lent money by the largest owner which gets piled on as club debt is a terrible business practice.
They could just invest that money straight up, which City have done.
Would a new owner have to buy out FSGs share and then their debt too?
