Don't recall Fraudiola doing it eitherDont remember Keegan winning league titles or champions leagues
Buying, on the other hand...
Don't recall Fraudiola doing it eitherDont remember Keegan winning league titles or champions leagues
Alternatively, they get fairer refereeing in EuropeI'd suggest that they also get less favourable decisions in Europe.
In the Premier League they're now regarded as one of the big fish.
In the Champions League they're still tiddlers, especially when it comes to Real and the like.
Don't recall Fraudiola doing it either
Buying, on the other hand...
I don't remember Keegan having unlimited funds either.
I don't get why you always rush to defend Guardiola, the teams he has managed were expected to win because they had all the resources and all the players. Keegan had none of those advantages so yes it's unfair to compare them. This has been said many times but if Pepe had managed a team without all the advantages and achieved something then, he might deserve all the plaudits but he hasn't.Eh?
He’s won league titles in the three best leagues in Europe and the champions league twice.
To compare him to Kevin Keegan is utterly ridiculous.
Keegan could've won the league with Bayern - and probably wouldn't have doubled their wage bill to do soEh?
He’s won league titles in the three best leagues in Europe and the champions league twice.
To compare him to Kevin Keegan is utterly ridiculous.
I posted my reply before you came back. I do question phrases like 'managerial brilliance' I don't see that at all. For me he is a one trick pony who can't even sort out a proper defence, but I understand why. He's never had to.True but to just dismiss Pep’s managerial brilliance because he’s always been at a big club with huge resources is unfair. Lots of managers across Europe have unlimited funds yet still struggle. Look at Poch for example, had Neymar, Messi and Mbappe and still got the sack.

Once you get into the last 16 of the Champions League then it is very likely that one of the top eight teams in Europe will win it, with approx equal probability. So City ought to win it every 6-10 years. No evidence yet that Pep has underperformed.The difference between the PL, and the UEFA KOs,
is that you can "amortise" losses over a season for the former.
Each KO round, and you only have the 2nd leg to
correct for any errors in the 1st leg.
Take Spurs last season for example.
Citeh lost twice to us, but they still won the title
with a pts total of 93.
Using statistics to take an argument to RBDB ? Good luck with that?Once you get into the last 16 of the Champions League then it is very likely that one of the top eight teams in Europe will win it, with approx equal probability. So City ought to win it every 6-10 years. No evidence yet that Pep has underperformed.

Considering he took Bayern backwards during his tenure there, there is certainly proof of him underperforming in the CLOnce you get into the last 16 of the Champions League then it is very likely that one of the top eight teams in Europe will win it, with approx equal probability. So City ought to win it every 6-10 years. No evidence yet that Pep has underperformed.
Keegan could've won the league with Bayern - and probably wouldn't have doubled their wage bill to do so
Poch won the league and nobody has taken PSG to the CL so he didn't fail. His achievement at Spurs was of an order above what he did in Paris and for me more impressive than anything Guadriola has managed in his managerial career.True but to just dismiss Pep’s managerial brilliance because he’s always been at a big club with huge resources is unfair. Lots of managers across Europe have unlimited funds yet still struggle. Look at Poch for example, had Neymar, Messi and Mbappe and still got the sack.
Considering he took Bayern backwards during his tenure there, there is certainly proof of him underperforming in the CL
The simple reason they chose him was because he was a free agent at the timeBut he didn’t. There’s a reason that clubs that could choose any manager around all choose Pep.
Except it isn't, because just like Keegan his solution for a rickety defence is to spunk a massive amount of money on another strikerHe probably did. But you compared him to Kevin Keegan which is ridiculous
Poch won the league and nobody has taken PSG to the CL so he didn't fail. His achievement at Spurs was of an order above what he did in Paris and for me more impressive than anything Guadriola has managed in his managerial career.
The simple reason they chose him was because he was a free agent at the time
Except it isn't, because just like Keegan his solution for a rickety defence is to spunk a massive amount of money on another striker
Not in my view obviously and we are talking opinions here so the viewpoints are different. How is winning the league a failure in France for Poch but in England winning the league confirms Guardiola as a managerial giant?Poch failed at PSG, like many managers before him.
Poch did well at Spurs and did over achieve with what he had but I’d disagree to say he did better at Spurs than Pep has at City is almost as far fetched as HBIC and his keegan comparison.
If they wanted him so badly, why did they wait eight months to hire him?A free agent? They were after him for years.
I don’t dispute he’s got ridiculous funds but he’s not the only one and yet he still wins the league most years. Keegan did a decent job at Newcastle but ultimately won **** all.
Once you get into the last 16 of the Champions League then it is very likely that one of the top eight teams in Europe will win it, with approx equal probability. So City ought to win it every 6-10 years. No evidence yet that Pep has underperformed.