FPP to take full control
- Thread starter Whiteleas Wanderer
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Done, happy to do anything to get things changed. We need answers and the time for action is now.
Done. . ....ticked a lot of boxes!
basically asking if you have renewed or not or has the virus effect your decision
The reason I have not renewed is because I can’t
I need to do it at the club shop for concessions
I mean this is literally my point
All I am saying is that theoretically, they have done a deal that allows them to takeover the club at some point in the future if they want. Is that a 'takeover' deal? Some people would say yes, some people would say not until the right to buy is exercised. It's a slightly ambiguous deal in that regard because it could still end up in all 3 outcomes (buy us, walk away, hold position).
So I am asking (politely) whether one man's takeover is another man's convertible loan, whether one man's 'deal to buy us' is exactly what we ended up with, and that the insistence - against the express public opinion of a man bound to legally not lie about FPP - that they made a bid to buy the majority of the shares in October last year may in fact refer to the convertible loan that they could exercise in future. I'm simply asking whether that terminology has caused confusion.
If you actually read it, it's trying to help us all understand what has happened and whether the 'two sides' are actually just talking about the same thing.
"I'm simply asking whether that terminology has caused confusion."
That terminology is yours, and yours alone, so there's no possibility of any confusion.
It's simply that you've imagined a theoretical scenario which I, and other people, don't believe is plausible.
Donald is a liar so I'm not inclined to believe anything he says about FPP or borrowing millions he claims he doesn't need. Nor do I believe any prospective buyers want to invest in him, rather than the club ...
... anyone who believes that is gullible in the extreme imo.
Last edited:
No it isn't.
Done deal - not my terminology (yours)
A deal was in place - not my terminology (GG's and Bob's)
Convertible loan - not my terminology (Everyone has used this, including Bob and GOM because it's an accurate description of the deal in place)
The situation is clearly plausible because what I am suggesting is that the same deal can be referred to by different names (Takeover, Deal, Convertible Loan) by different people (Donald, Methven, Your source, Bob's source) depending on how much detail they may know or want to make available. This isn't some wild scenario,
I'm suggesting that the deal you knew of could well be called a takeover by one person, and a convertible loan by another and yet refer to the exact same agreement.
Anyway, I'll assume that's a 'no, I haven't asked' then...
The answer is 'no' as far as I'm concerned.
It wasn't intended to turn out this way.
The loan came about after the takeover bid and are two totally different things.
