Isn't Bobbi Hadgraph one of the stand reps or was she only on the new badge committee? She has just been voted on as a director of the HSCT, if she is one of the stand reps, how does that play out with the Allam's I wonder?
Or the club at [email protected] Appeasement won't work with this lot. I can't believe so many are still falling for this. You're allowing them to string you along.
Who is? I doubt there’s a single poster on here who doesn’t think it’s a complete and utter waste of time.
Well they haven’t done a couple of things they’d agreed They haven’t put the stand reps email addresses on the website as far as I can see And more importantly they haven’t changed the bloody website address.
The website domain is a classic example of the Allam blame-throwing bunker mentality. The club fixated on getting a domain name that they are fully aware is owned and used by someone extremely unlikely to hand it over for free. The club then launched a pretty unpleasant and snarky twitter campaign blaming the domain owner for a lack of progress, while surreptitiously buying hullcity.co.uk and not using it. I believe that is termed a ****’s trick.
Phone up to buy away tickets and it's "to book tickets for Hull City Tigers..." Too busy seeking buyers for the club to record a new phone message, perhaps.
That the girl that did a really cringey match report video for Sky Sports a few weeks back? Yeah she was on the badge board.
Doubt any of us are falling for it. Those going and “representing” are probably the last of the few happy clappers. Thinking they’re making a difference by licking the club’s backside.
suggested agenda: 1. Why is HCST not here ? 2. Concessions 3. Concessions 4. Concessions 5. Concessions meeting closed
No, it's not, balkan tiger. Although the foolishness and futility of giving these meetings oxygen is all too clear. My view has never changed. What does confuse me is why the content, hypocrisy and manipulation of the owner organised meetings is quite rightly highlighted constantly, by so many frequent posters, yet they seem to want to support those same meetings. The Trust are entitled to attend, but it is not essential that they do. It never has been. Just an observation.
