Off Topic Climate Change

Add coward into that too

Spineless fat unlovable, childless, talentless lying pathetic loner who spends all day every day on a football forum for his social life

You really are a pile of human feces

 

And you wonder why people don’t want to engage with you?

 

I’m none of those things I’m afraid, so your sad little fantasy fails again.

Go ask your Mrs if you can borrow your own bollocks, you emasculated freak.

You’re an intellectual lightweight, who’s so insuecure about that fact, that he’s gone to Uni in his 40’s and insults anyone who holds a different view to him, trying to decry their intelligence. You’re as transparent as tissue paper.

 

Except its not true. I clearly started on this thread discussing what evidence there is and debunking claims with counter arguments.

Some of the others, looney and Tobes dont like the counter arguments and talk about me personally, because that is their level, and I oblige.
This round of nonsense started over me debunking spurious media reports, and the lads got offended by that.

You need to cherry pick comments to make the claim you make here.

Flying off the handle, is your perception, I'm always calm, if abusive Any time you've made a reasonable argument I responded in kind, and I can demonstrate that with quotes


Several requests for evidence go unanswered and instead posts about me personally and little like circle jerks are the result. Here you are not posting evidence and talking about me Interesting that you even point it out.

Crying about me tagging Diego, lol. He's pragmatic and is evidence based, this thread needs one sane person to see the utter blendery in the responses to me.

Remove all of the belligerent posts on this thread, and you are left with posts from looney that are not evidence for AGW, and Tobes calling me oil shill (because that was his default when I was not belligerent and he didn't like the facts as they stood) , and me debunking bogus claims that have no real evidence to support them.

Allegedly 97% of scientists agree (a lie).. so there should be so much actual evidence, that no counter argument is possible.

Oh btw, you never confirmed whether I was right or not about NYT pushing climate propaganda with their fake temperature data set, I mention this because you engaged, and I assume you checked? They are, the NYT fake temperature data sets are not actual temperature data sets at all.

 

I take it Sisu is sticking to his strategy of hurling personal abuse at anyone who picks apart his arguments. It's the strategy of a true intellect.

 

Speaking as a neutral who stumbled onto this thread... you come across as an arrogant, argumentative, aggressive tool. You might have all the facts in the world but when you write posts the way you do, everyone will ridicule and ignore what you say.

 

Two US electric utilities recently declared it’s cheaper to tear down their coal plants and build renewable-energy plants than to keep the old boilers running.

https://qz.com/1490832/two-utilities-promised-to-go-100-carbon-free-last-week

It cannot be!!!
Trump said so.

 

High subsidy renewables

https://english.rvo.nl/news/dutch-g...y-free-700-mw-offshore-wind-farm-tender-round

 

Cost of renewables and low carbon sources compared to fossil fuels.

https://cleantechnica.com/2018/11/12/whoo-hoo-lazards-levelized-cost-of-energy-version-12-0-is-here/

 

Well he's certainly coming across as a complete knobhead.