Nothing wrong with a man bag...I hope you reprimanded him in no uncertain terms for that man bag sw3!!
Nothing wrong with a man bag...I hope you reprimanded him in no uncertain terms for that man bag sw3!!
Gotta keep your knuckle duster somewhere...Nothing wrong with a man bag...![]()
And your selection of hip flasksGotta keep your knuckle duster somewhere...
Scotland v France. Now who to support...
Got to be France.
As much conning is tried on in RU as in football, if not more. There's allsorts goes in in scrums, rucks and mauls where players are trying to win a penalty or nick the ball. It's just that it appears less objectionable in RU because (a) you can't see the half of it, and (b) as you rightly say, players accept the ref's decision.What I like is that you haven’t got objectionable ****s like Sterling and others of his ilk, on £250k + a week throwing themselves on the ground, as if they have been shot, to try and cheat a free kick or penalty.
Also they give 100% and don’t surround the ref every time a decision is given against them.
It is refreshing to watch players, playing the game that they love, without having to resort to dubious tactics to try and con the officials into giving them something that isn’t there.
As much conning is tried on in RU as in football, if not more. There's allsorts goes in in scrums, rucks and mauls where players are trying to win a penalty or nick the ball. It's just that it appears less objectionable in RU because (a) you can't see the half of it, and (b) as you rightly say, players accept the ref's decision.
True enough.But they don't feign injury, which is the most objectionable thing in football.
But they don't feign injury, which is the most objectionable thing in football.
Has Tom Williams's mouth 'injury' cleared up yet?
The views expressed in my posts are not necessarily mine.
As much conning is tried on in RU as in football, if not more. There's allsorts goes in in scrums, rucks and mauls where players are trying to win a penalty or nick the ball. It's just that it appears less objectionable in RU because (a) you can't see the half of it, and (b) as you rightly say, players accept the ref's decision.
But they don't feign injury, which is the most objectionable thing in football.
The fact you've had to go back 10 years to find an incident just proves the point.
I went yesterday and going to England v Ireland as well. I absolutely love the atmosphere and Twickenham, went for Tapas before where there where 200-300 rugby fans all getting drunk together, it was brilliant.
My knowledge of rugby isn't what it used to be. If it isn't clear who should get the benefit of the doubt? In cricket the batsman always gets the benefit of the doubt (Misconception though, this rule doesn't actually exist), but in rugby does the defending team get it?
Good performances, we weren't great, but we won that's all that matters and our execution when presented with opportunities is great.
It proves the point to be incorrect. They do fake injury.
It proves the point to be incorrect. They do fake injury.