Harry Redknapp has suggested that it might be better to sell Modric to Chelsea and reinvest the money on the squad.
This opens up two issues, for me.
Firstly, should Redknapp be censured by Levy for constantly discussing Spurs' transfer targets, attempted sales and problems shifting squad players, as well as undermining Levy's stance that the Croatian playmaker isn't for sale?
Secondly, if we were to sell Modric to Chelsea, what would be an acceptable price, possibly including players in part-exchange and who would you want to replace him?
This whole thing has dragged on for ages now and Levy either needs to tell Redknapp to stop talking about it and draw a line under the whole saga or bite the bullet and get the best deal that he can, so that we can move on.
Allowing the manager and his staff to make statements that contradict his official stance just makes him look weak and makes it appear that there are divisions in the camp.
This opens up two issues, for me.
Firstly, should Redknapp be censured by Levy for constantly discussing Spurs' transfer targets, attempted sales and problems shifting squad players, as well as undermining Levy's stance that the Croatian playmaker isn't for sale?
Secondly, if we were to sell Modric to Chelsea, what would be an acceptable price, possibly including players in part-exchange and who would you want to replace him?
This whole thing has dragged on for ages now and Levy either needs to tell Redknapp to stop talking about it and draw a line under the whole saga or bite the bullet and get the best deal that he can, so that we can move on.
Allowing the manager and his staff to make statements that contradict his official stance just makes him look weak and makes it appear that there are divisions in the camp.
