Mafia 4

IWell if anyone cant fibd me, I'll be camped out on the arsenal board all week

Out of interest, can we change votes? Not that I want to because Gerrez must die!!!

Edit: Just seen brb's post.

 

as long s there is more than one person selected. we know from game 3 putting a few up in a tie is better.

sky has a 4/15 chance of picking a mafia. if he picks 4 at least he's got a better chance.

do you agree?

 

FYI.

I did a follow up on this lead. AFC hasn't been posting ANYWHERE since last posting on here. So being quiet I think is just a result of not being online.

Perhaps working.



/ which is something I must now do...

 

yes you may change as many times as you wish. the theory is however the later you do it or have no good reason you look suspicious

 

Obviously if Sky just uses a random number generator or whatever, then yes, it should be random.

I would say that IBWT should stick with Sky for now. The only way Sky will be in danger of lynching is if someone else joins in in voting for him, which should be a death wish for them. Assuming IBWT has been coerced, then better for him to vote Sky and stay alive for now (based on the rules we know) than for him to switch and (unnecessarily) die.

 

Yes, you can change votes any amount of times up until Astro calls night.


/ Changing votes last minute without a damn good reason is usually only done by mafia though... so if you change your vote with 2 minutes to go prepare to be on the receiving end of votes tomorrow. Best for town that you get your final vote in before the final hour... unless there is a late reason to change your vote such as mafia look to be moving to rig the vote, in which case you may want to try to counteract them.

 

fun fun fun...

I dunno.... the votes still the same btw.

 

There are too many people being quiet! I never know whether thats a sign of guilt or not to be honest. Yeah they don't run the risk of saying anything silly and putting their foot in it if they are Mafia, but it also means a) They dont get the chance to manipulate votes and b) By trying not to draw attention to themselves they inadvertently do the exact opposite by keeping Shtum, so that wouldn't really help them either.

 

And that is... (originally posted by MITO- bringing it to the front so people don't have to hunt back for it):


Voting Table: (Order vertically is from first person voted to most recent person voted for, Order of votes by is first cast listed first, second listed second etc)
[table="width: 500, class: grid, align: left"]
[tr]
[td]Nominee[/td]
[td]Votes[/td]
[td]Vote(s) By[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Gerrez[/td]
[td]2[/td]
[td]AfcFtw, valley[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Lucaaas[/td]
[td]2[/td]
[td]Mito,mummy[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]BRB[/td]
[td]1[/td]
[td]gerrez[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]IBWT[/td]
[td]2[/td]
[td]nozzer, billy[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]RHC[/td]
[td]1[/td]
[td]bodanki[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]sky[/td]
[td]1[/td]
[td]IBWT[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]afcftw[/td]
[td]2[/td]
[td]swarbs,brb[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]

not voted listed alphabetically: Danilo, Lucaaas,RHC, Skylarker

Table of people with no votes: (listed alphabetically)
[table="width: 500, class: grid, align: left"]
[tr]
[td]Nominee[/td]
[td]Votes[/td]
[td]Vote(s) By[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Billy[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]bodanki[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Danilo[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]
mummy's milk[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]MITO[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Nozzer[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Swarbs[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Valleygraduate12[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]No lynch[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]

 

ok i'm heagin home so be on in an hour or so.

please note:

sky is on 1 vote and 4 are on 2 votes.

he is at risk and nobody is changing so I want t know now... if this is the same in an hour surely we are changing it to get 3 people up to 3 votes? no? If not why not?

 

1. No I didn't. I said they should be consider potentially guilty.

2. If this was the other way around and I was attempting to talk you out of using Sky it in that way, that would make sense. The way it is, the only person reacting is you. You obviously don't like the idea, why is that?

 

Or afcftw.

 

Just to clarify, I'm only talking about today (Day one) and not the entire game

 

Being quiet is not by itself "guilty". Acting differently is a way to spot people who are guilty.

Someone who is usually quiet becoming talkative can be as much a sign of guilt as someone who is usually talkative becoming quiet. Sometimes on other forums they have "anonymous" games where people sign in with alternate aliases for the game so that you can't tell who is who- and go off previous game performances.

We have the advantage here of having played two or three games with most of the people already- so look for people acting differently without a good reason. Either talking more... or talking less. (or being less helpful than normal).

 

Deluded #allaboutgreez

 

Maybe, but anyone voting for Sky (except IBWT) is surely commiting suicide?

 

Fair enough... I think that would work... assuming Sky shows up early enough for us to act on his decisions.

 

Hardly surprising is it #lynchmob

 

Astro said there are "Unexpected twists" - his description of the game rules said that they are "not the complete rules". There could be some other mechanism at play. We talked about silent votes a little in previous Mafia discussion threads. We did a little on the last one too... it is possible that there is a role with a silent vote- if Mafia, for example had a silent vote they could bring Sky in to a tie with them.

 

I intend to copy Sky's vote and every vote in every round from here on in #followtheleaderleaderleader