The EU debate - Part III
- Thread starter Jürgenmeiʃter
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
- Status
I think some on here must have lived in hope at some point, but they seem to have moved now.
Do you reckon the Don will get a town named after him?
Reckon the firebrigade will be polishing their helmets in Trumpton?
So you've got a delusional opinion of DMD and you're bottling out of discussing things with him then?
It's quite funny to see a white supremacist criticising the left for pitting white against black, though.
Well done on that one.
It's nice to see Jacob Rees-Mogg being honest about what the Tories really want from Brexit:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-workers-rights-jacob-rees-mogg-a7459336.html
This is what they mean when they talk about cutting through red tape and reducing bureaucracy.
They don't give a **** about the people of this country, unless you happen to be extremely rich.
An utter shower of ****s that want to drag the country back to being a complete ****hole for most of the population.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-workers-rights-jacob-rees-mogg-a7459336.html
This is what they mean when they talk about cutting through red tape and reducing bureaucracy.
They don't give a **** about the people of this country, unless you happen to be extremely rich.
An utter shower of ****s that want to drag the country back to being a complete ****hole for most of the population.
The word COULD, that means we may do it, we may not
Last edited:
I'm just amazed that anybody takes that fruitcake seriously.
the left gets very upset when they think about possibilities
they prefer to tell people what will be done
We could launch our nuclear weapons at our own country. We're not going to, which is why it's not being discussed.
The Tories are refusing to commit to anything on this, because they want to remove protections and rights.
That's what they were talking about before the referendum and it's what UKIP stand for.
You'd have to be very naive not to see this, but you just carry on. I'm sure it'll be fine.
He's been posted on here more than once as a very sensible fellow, I'll have you know!
Naw did baby not get what he wants?So you've got a delusional opinion of DMD and you're bottling out of discussing things with him then?
It's quite funny to see a white supremacist criticising the left for pitting white against black, though.
Well done on that one.
No, we're not. Lack of regulation caused our current financial problems.
What a pathetic non-answer. Care to address the points that I made or is that too hard for you, too?
The Tories wanted even less regulation and pledged to match their spending, so it would've been even worse under them.
After WW2 Germany reduced red tape and they thrived, the UK gave us more and we suffered.
You're talking about a country that's known for it's love of bureaucracy, for ****'s sake.
Where did you get that particular gem from?
Which points were those? The ones that sought to cause a conflict between myself and someone else or the one about me being a white supremacist? I have no obligation to address any of the points you make, particularly in this instance, we're not discussing anything of importance.
Ah, more bottling and non-answers. You're learning well from those that you seek to arse-kiss... er, I mean emulate.
What was your problem with being called a white supremacist, anyway? I thought that you acknowledged that?
Not still pretending that you're not, surely?
So Germany isn't known for it's bureaucracy, then?
The idea that we should embrace ****tier conditions and less rights is utterly stupid.
Just another one to add to your pile though, I guess.
- Status