I have a firm assertion that you're a boring old **** with no life. It doesn't make me an expert on the subject.
You're confusing having an opinion with having expertise which isn't that surprising as you tend to have neither.
The EU debate - Part III
- Thread starter Jürgenmeiʃter
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
- Status
I have a firm assertion that you're a boring old **** with no life. It doesn't make me an expert on the subject.
You're confusing having an opinion with having expertise which isn't that surprising as you tend to have neither.
I have loads of opinions, I try to make them considered opinions though, or it runs the risk of just swallowing main stream media bullshit instead of thinking for yourself.
I believe a fair few on here are over-sensitive and prone to outbursts of pointless childish abuse that adds nothing to the conversation.
Your arse seems to make an awful lot of pointless comments.
He got that carried away he forgot to log off in time to pretend he'd gone the matchGreat effort by Dull this Saturday. So far he's posted 42 essays in 6 hours. That's a new essay every 8.5 minutes.
EDIT: he's clearly running out of steam as he's now resorting to one liners and Kustard type emoji posts.
He's having a mare today
I've never 'pretended' to go to a game. 
My machine is generally logged in as I don't always bother turning it off. It's just tedious fail after tedious fail.
The tendency on here is to try to package people and then apply a label, rather than fully engage.
It's a common tactic among the social justice types. They wriggle around until they can apply an over used label, and then shuffle off af if they've won.
It's a world view and ideology that's crumbling. It's counter productive, as the division created leaves people with two options, and people are turning away from the bullshit brigade side of it.
There's more of a liberal movement now that's keen on having a more open debate. The likes of Trevor Phillips is a good example of what the future could be when the bigots are flushed away.
Far better to have open conversations, rather than ridiculous exchanges of abuse that just lead to threads like this,
My machine is generally logged in as I don't always bother turning it off.
It's just tedious fail after tedious fail.The tendency on here is to try to package people and then apply a label, rather than fully engage.
It's a common tactic among the social justice types. They wriggle around until they can apply an over used label, and then shuffle off af if they've won.
It's a world view and ideology that's crumbling. It's counter productive, as the division created leaves people with two options, and people are turning away from the bullshit brigade side of it.
There's more of a liberal movement now that's keen on having a more open debate. The likes of Trevor Phillips is a good example of what the future could be when the bigots are flushed away.
Far better to have open conversations, rather than ridiculous exchanges of abuse that just lead to threads like this,
I've never 'pretended' to go to a game.
My machine is generally logged in as I don't always bother turning it off.
The tendency on here is to try to package people and then apply a label, rather than fully engage.
It's a common tactic among the social justice types. They wriggle around until they can apply an over used label, and then shuffle off af if they've won.
It's a world view and ideology that's crumbling. It's counter productive, as the division created leaves people with two options, and people are turning away from the bullshit brigade side of it.
There's more of a liberal movement now that's keen on having a more open debate. The likes of Trevor Phillips is a good example of what the future could be when the bigots are flushed away.
Far better to have open conversations, rather than ridiculous exchanges of abuse that just lead to threads like this,
Yes. Let's all ask lots of questions and give no answers.
Great effort by Dull this Saturday. So far he's posted 42 essays in 6 hours. That's a new essay every 8.5 minutes.
EDIT: he's clearly running out of steam as he's now resorting to one liners and Kustard type emoji posts.
and all you post are crap and pointless snide remarks.
As you just have.
What would also help is if some ****wits would realise that not every question can be properly answered yes or no, and to stop droning on as if they do.
Another point I keep making is it's not a matter of 'winning' or 'losing' it's about having a conversation of the facts (on the issues, not pseudo personal ****e) it just leaves people trying to prove someone fits totally in a particular box, and others dogmatically hanging on to the views of 'their side' rather than having a considered opinion of their own.
And Kustard makes a quick appearance from Dull's arse to defend his hero.
How was that?
Just as an aside. I'm in Budapest - nice City!....
I thought about Hull, just to see if everybody who lives there is a thick, mouth breathing, racist halfwit. But my lady convinced me that on balance Budapest might be a tad more interesting.
I thought about Hull, just to see if everybody who lives there is a thick, mouth breathing, racist halfwit. But my lady convinced me that on balance Budapest might be a tad more interesting.
Given when they finally got nailed down to a conversation, your buddies like stuttering found we share many similar views, which shows your comment as the meaningless nonsense it is.
Above all else, why not just discuss the issues instead of getting hung up on sides.
- Status